Answer: Direct examination
Explanation:
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
The answer will be A hope this helps
Answer: A mix of local, state regulations, and common law, vary from state to state.
Explanation: Edge
Answer:
I am fairly certain it is c.
Explanation:
There is a website that is called Frequently Used terms and Phrases posted by New York State. (I would have posted the link but when I did the first time, my response was deleted.)
It gives you the break down on many words pertaining to CJ.
