Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation of the internal rate of return is shown below:
Given that
The expected cash inlfows would be $9,400 for four years each
Rate of return is 7%
The Initial investment is $30,455
Based on the above information
The net present value is
= $9,400 × PVIFA factor for 7% at 4 years - $30,455
= $9,400 × 3.3872 - $30,455
= $31,840 - $30,455
= $1,385
Now the present value factor is
= $30,455 ÷ $9,400
= 3.2399
Now based on the factor table, the rate should be 9% for four years
b. Yes depend upon the internal rate of return, the park co should make the investment
To record the write-off of receivables:
Allowance for doubtful accounts ----------------------------$24,000
Accounts Receivable -----------------------------------------------$24,000
To record the accounts receivable collected from the written-off receivable, first restore the accounts receivable with the following entry:
Accounts Receivable ------------------------------------------$1,900
Allowance for doubtful accounts ------------------------------$1,900
To record the collection of accounts receivable:
Cash -----------------------------------------------------------------$1,900
Accounts Receivable ----------------------------------------------$1,900
Or, the direct journal entry to record the collection of previously written-off accounts receivable is:
Cash ---------------------------------------------------------------$1,900
Allowance for doubtful accounts ------------------------------$1,900
Answer:
$22.50 per unit
Explanation:
Mark -up is the percentage of cost that is earned as profit.
Using mark-up,
Selling price = Total cost + total profit
Total cot = Fixed cost + variable cost
Total costs = $400,000 + (10× 50,000)
= $900,000
Sales revenue = 125%× 900,000
= 1,125,000
Selling price per unit = Sales revenue/units
=1,125,000/50,000
= $22.50 per unit
Answer: The manufacturer, because the shoe store's revocation of its offer was too late.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario given in the question, if the store manager subsequently refuses the manufacturer's delivery on December 1, and thee manufacturer sues the shoe store for breach of contract, the manufacturer will prevail because the shoe store's revocation of its offer was too late.
According to the mailbox rule under the contract law, this is the default rule that's used to determine when an offer is considered to be accepted and when there's communication of the acceptance. In this case, the revocation is too late therefore the manufacturer will prevail.
