John Rawls tossed this Latin expression around "a blank state" to enable us to comprehend ourselves in a circumstance in which there were no tenets. We needed to build up the standards for how we would communicate with each other exclusively and in business. Rawls trusted that judicious souls would concur on some fundamental and reasonable tenets that would help them additionally secure others.
The name which is given to the response is to reclaim freedom by doing exactly what we were told we are not allowed to do when someone threatens our freedom is:
According to the given question, we are asked to state the name which is given to the response is to reclaim freedom by doing exactly what we were told we are not allowed to do when someone threatens our freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that there is a will to be free and independent and when a person tries to threaten those freedom, then there is a chance that the people would do what they are not allowed to do in order to reclaim that freedom and this is called reactance.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/19037183
Answer:
<u>The following words are the correct answers to complete the sentence: </u>
vigilant, zealous.
Since her house was broken into, Deidre has become especially <u>vigilant</u> about locking the doors when she leaves and particularly <u>zealous</u> in recruiting others to participate in the neighborhood watch program.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The adjectives vigilant and zealous are the correct words to complete the sentence. The adjective vigilant means to be attentive, to pay attention and be aware of a situation or a person in order to notice any problems or signs of danger in a quick way. Since her house was broken into, it makes sense for Deidre to be vigilant about locking the doors when she leaves the house. The other adjective, zealous, means to show a fervent partisanship for a cause, an ideal, or a person. After having her house broken into, Deidre has become zealous in recruiting others to participate in the neighborhood watch program.
Answer:
Fewer U.S. dollars were in circulation in 2015 than in 2019.
Explanation:
Exchange rates are known to be constantly fluctuating, and demand and supply are the causes of the rise and fall of currency values. When there is a higher demand for any nation’s currency or a shortage of the supply of that currency, then there would likely be an increase in price
.
From the question here, people received a higher value of the Mexican currency in 2019 because the US dollars that were in circulation in 2015 was smaller than that of 2019
.
Answer:there is only a responsible person of this Nd those are our political leaders
Explanation: i hope this help
