Answer:
Confirmation bias
Explanation:
According to the given statements in the question it can be concluded that the Sharon's approach illustrates " the confirmation bias ".
The confirmation bias means that a person seeks for the information or evidences that take forward their personal beliefs or gives a confirmation to the thoughts or beliefs that are already in their mind.
Here,
Sharon looks for the news that supports her existing political belief.
1. Second Continental Congress
2. Army at Valley Forge
3. Shays Rebellion
4. US constitution ratification
5. Louisiana Purchase
Hope this helps!
In the context of team and organizational effectiveness, the Dunning–Kruger effect refers to people systematically overestimating their own performance in areas where they lack competence and readily dismissing any information to the contrary.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Dunning-Kruger effects refer a situation in which people trust like they only smart and have more ability than in real scenario. However, person with less capability do not possess the more skills which required to realise their own inability.
Golem effect, a psychological effects in which less expectations are made upon individual either by superiors or by themselves, leading to poorer performance. Pygmalion effect defines the phenomenon where others' expectations for achieving the target by a person affects the aimed person's performance level.
Autler towns’ effect is related with the ohysic term for the effect and result to an oscillating electric field. From this, concluding that Option A is correct to the given statement.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Modifiers are forms of adjectives/adverbs which helps to tell more about something. It tells ‘what kind and how many’ in the description of the word involved. For example a black hat has black as its modified as it tells more about what kind of hat is being talked about.
Three goals scored also has three as its modifier as it tells how many goals were scored. This makes the statement about modifiers telling what kind and how many being true.
Answer:
Bias from affiliation
Explanation:
A party wants it politicians to benefit it, and whatever will satisfy the public is all that matters; other politicians and others that are worked with may not support the person attempting to address climate change due to their need to bring power to their party. Other nations are also difficult to challenge due to moral beliefs. Climate change is likely greatly caused by the industries of Developing Countries, and their wants to progress, this creates a dilemma, every modernized and 'well-off' nation has done this and had this affect on the Earth at some point.
