the most serious flaw of this design is: <span>They have not defined happiness or how it will be measured.
Happiness is very subjective because it each person may have a different source of happiness. For some people, it maybe the success of their career while for the other it's simply doing what they love to do. Not only that, if Magali and Jane collect the data simply by asking like that, they would not know whether the person is telling the truth.</span>
Answer:
A. make sure your goals are ethically sound
Explanation:
Clotilde did not verify the information she got from her vegetarian aunt that claimed that meat consumption was the number one cause for cancer in the United States and she went ahead to use such unverified information in a speech.
She violated one guideline for ethical speaking which is that she did not make her speech ethically sound as it contained the opinion of a person but was said in such a way that her listeners would take it as an established fact.
Because of Clotilde's carelessness, she has misinformed sections of the public which goes against the ethic of public speech.
Answer: a phrase, generally attributed to James Otis about 1761, that reflected the resentment of American colonists at being taxed by a British Parliament to which they elected no representatives and became an anti-British slogan before the American Revolution; in full, “Taxation without representation is tyranny.”
Taxation without representation was possibly the first slogan adopted by American colonists chafing under British rule. 1 They objected to the imposition of taxes on colonists by a government that gave them no role in its policies.
Explanation:
When you are dealing with this type of situation, there are some strategies that you can try and that are likely to help you get out of your problem.
First, if you have people around you that might help you out, take advantage of it. Try speaking with an instructor or classmate and return to the question afterwards. Another strategy is to look over the question again and try to find any hints that address the part of the calculation that you are unsure about. Finally, if these strategies do not work, submit your answer and adjust it according to the feedback you receive.
According to the structural-functional approach, the one that considered as a direct benefit of disengagement from work is: It allows the next generation to transition into jobs.
Especially when a worker became too old for his job, it would be really beneficial if they start to train a younger potential replacement for him when his retirement time come.
