<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
Answer: Dionysus in Roman mythology was called Bacchus.
Explanation:
The Romans took over religious beliefs from the ancient Greeks, only giving their gods other names. Dionysus, the Greek god of wine and fertility, was called Bacchus by the Romans. It is a deity that is also associated with the harvest. According to Roman mythology, Bacchus was interested in wine and grapes as a boy. It was often celebrated at various parties where there were large quantities of wine.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Olympics brought people from all over the world that started to settle in.
(Brainliest?)
By the time that the Declaration of Independence was adopted in July 1776, the Thirteen Colonies and Great Britain had been at war for more than a year. The colonies were not directly represented in Parliament, and colonists argued that Parliament had no right to levy taxes upon them.
