Answer: A. Kingston may be held liable to Remstat because he usurped a corporate opportunity.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the correct option is that Kingston may be held liable to Remstat because he usurped a corporate opportunity.
Usurpation of a corporate opportunity is typically regarded as a form of breach of duty and it arises when a worker in a particular company uses the information that he has for his own personal gain.
In this case, Kingston is the 100 percent shareholder of KKIM and uses the information that he has regarding the sabres to his benefit.
Therefore, the correct option is A.
Answer: right to know laws
Explanation: Under the laws of right-to-know, it is the right of workers to avail their employers information on the hazardous chemicals at the workplace. This is in accordance with the OSHA standards and is therefore applicable to manufacturing companies, particularly those producing chemicals or using chemicals.
This law specifies perspectives such as:-
1. Employer must maintain a list of all hazardous products in the work place.
2. Labeling of chemical containers must be done.
3. Material safety data sheets must be prepared.
4. Workers must be trained to use such chemicals.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
C. $0.30/bu
Explanation:
Given that
Cash cost = $1.50/bu
Opportunity cost of labour = $0.30/bu
Opportunity cost of Land = $0.40/bu
Sales from corn = $2.50/bu
Recall that economic profits = Total income - Total expenses - opportunities cost
Therefore
Economic profits = 2.50 - 1.50 - (0.30 + 0.40)
= 2.50 - 1.50 - 0.70
= 0.30
Therefore, economic profits = $0.30/bu
