All categories

3 years ago

SOLVE WITH AN EXPLANATION PLS

Mathematics

2 answers:

Softa [21]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Option C
Option B

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's simplify this further to get our answer.

-5/6(12 - 6x + 18y)
=> -60/6 + 30x/6 - 90y/6
=> -10 + 5x - 15y

Looking at the options, we can say that Option C and B are correct.

Drupady [299]3 years ago

3 0

$\\ \sf\longmapsto \dfrac{-5}{6}(12-6x+18y)$

$\\ \sf\longmapsto \dfrac{-5}{6}(12)-\dfrac{(-5)}{6}(6x)+\dfrac{-5}{6}(18y)$

$\\ \sf\longmapsto -5(2)-(-5x)+(-5)(3y)$

$\\ \sf\longmapsto -10+5x-15y$

You might be interested in

Molecules of a toxic chemical eventually decompose into inert substances. Suppose the decomposition time is exponentially distri

koban [17]

Answer:

a) 4.16 years

b) 27.73 years

c) 238.44 years

d) 3,870.53 years

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X be the random variable that measures the decomposition time.

$\bf \lambda =6$

In this case, since the decomposition time is exponentially distributed with a mean of 1/6, we have

$\bf P(X\leq t)=1-e^{-t/6}\Rightarrow P(X>t)=1-(1-e^{-t/6})=e^{-t/6}$

and we must find a t such that P(x>t)=0.5.

$\bf P(X>t)=0.5\Rightarrow e^{-t/6}=0.5\Rightarrow -t/6=ln(0.5)\Rightarrow t=-6ln(0.5)=4.16\;years$

$\bf \lambda =40$

$\bf P(X>t)=0.5\Rightarrow e^{-t/40}=0.5\Rightarrow -t/40=ln(0.5)\Rightarrow t=-40ln(0.5)=27.73\;years$

$\bf \lambda =344$

$\bf P(X>t)=0.5\Rightarrow e^{-t/344}=0.5\Rightarrow -t/344=ln(0.5)\Rightarrow t=-344ln(0.5)=238.44\;years$

$\bf \lambda =5584$

$\bf P(X>t)=0.5\Rightarrow e^{-t/5584}=0.5\Rightarrow -t/5584=ln(0.5)\Rightarrow t=-5584ln(0.5)=3870.53\;years$

5 0

4 years ago

Round of the underlined digit in each day decimal number

Sveta_85 [38]

Step-by-step explanation:

ID = 801 720 6270

Pas = 1234

Jôîn frm zøôm app

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Janice thinks that 20 hundredths is equivalent to 2 thousandths because 20 hundreds is equal to 2 thousands. Use words and a pla

expeople1 [14]

Explanation:

On the left hand side of the place value chart, 20 hundreds is equal to 2 thousands because thousands is larger than hundreds. 2 thousands is 2(1000)=2000. 20 hundreds is 20(100)=2000. They are the same number.

However, on the right hand side of the place value chart, hundredths is larger than thousandths. To say that 20 hundredths is the same as 2 thousandths is incorrect, because you're saying more of a larger quantity is the same as less of a smaller quantity.

Hundredths are two places after the decimal, and have a value of 0.01. 20 hundredths is 20(0.01) = 0.2.

Thousandths are three places after the decimal and have a value of 0.001. 2 thousandths is 2(0.001) = 0.002.

We can write 0.2 as 0.200; this way we can see that 0.200 is larger than 0.002. They are not equal.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Could someone help????

LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

3 1/2 + 3 1/2 is 7

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the first and last deciles of the standard Normal distribution?

aliya0001 [1]

My best Guess is

1.282 for upper . , -1.282 for lower.

Hope this Helps

-Dante

5 0

3 years ago