Answer:
D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
Explanation:
John Locke, an English philosopher, widely referred to as Father of Liberalism, examines the "State of Nature" for the purpose of showing why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
According to him, each individual in a society has a natural right to protect his or her own life, liberty, and property and at the same time, each individual has a natural right to seek for compensation for any wrongful injury to his or her natural rights; life, liberty, or property which has been inflicted by other individuals.
However, Locke, believed that, since 'state of nature' is more or less a state of insecurity, that is, each individual is not secured to possible infringement of his or her natural rights by other individuals. Hence, the needs to create a civil government, whose purpose is to protect the natural rights, freedom and well-being of all members of society.
This is because, in a "state of nature" there is no legislative or judicial authority that members of the society can seek for help in order to protect their natural rights, such as lives, liberty, or property. But to ensure there is security and protection to individuals natural right, there is need for a civil government, with a judicial authority whose purpose is to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.
I believe the answer is married filing jointly. pls make my answer brainliest
Answer:
Coalition governments
Explanation:
Coalition governments usually are a temporary alliance, being formed when no single political party gains a clear majority and competing parties instead negotiate to work together. Such a situation is likely to occur during a period of crisis, such as during a war, or in response to political breakdown.
Answer:
rom 2000 to 2003 the percent of local police officers employed by a department with infield computer access to vehicle records increased from 67% to 78%.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
Answer:
Most Whites don’t see themselves as having “White Privilege,” particularly Whites from working class or low-income backgrounds like myself, and yet few of us are ever stopped by a policeman simply because we’re driving, walking or jogging through a neighborhood, in which they perceive we don’t belong. All of this simply because of the color of one’s skin
