1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OlgaM077 [116]
3 years ago
15

A commonly used test in a disparate impact case is the four-fifths rule which bases potential discrimination of a minority group

relative to
Social Studies
1 answer:
julia-pushkina [17]3 years ago
3 0

There are different kinds of rules.  A commonly used test in a disparate impact case is the four-fifths rule which bases potential discrimination of a minority group relative to organization's hiring rate to be less than four-fifths of the hiring rate for the majority group.

<h3>What is the four-fifths rule?</h3>

There has been evidence of some discrimination if an organization's hiring rate for a minority group is said to be less than four-fifths of the hiring rate for the majority group.

The 4/5ths Rule is known to be a rule of thumb under which looks at the  selection rate for any race, or ethnic group and has found it to be less than four-fifths (4/5th) or eighty percent (80%) of the known selection rate for the said group with the biggest selection rate.

Learn more about  four-fifths rule  from

brainly.com/question/6111641

You might be interested in
Were was king tut burried?
pantera1 [17]
According to my notes, Tutankhamen's tomb was located in <span>KV62, Egypt.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Competency to stand trial (CST), according to the Dusky standard, has two basic components to its definition. The first componen
valkas [14]

Answer:Competency to stand trial (CST), according to the Dusky standard, has two basic components to its definition. The first component refers to the accused<u> individual's </u><u>Ability to interact rationally with an attorney</u> The second component refers to the accused individual's <u>understanding how the court process work.</u>

Explanation:

Competency to Stand Trial is a  a legal construct that states that an individual or defendant  should be able to understand the nature, reason and purpose of a legal proceedings against him and should be able to  effectively  interact rationally with an attorney or counsel in his defense. Such defendant should be able to understand the type of charges against him or her , the court room and the participants included, also he should be able to cooperate with his attorney by giving  details to in terms of facts including reasons and causes of his  actions for offence alleged on him or her so as to enable the attorney challenge witnesses  on his behalf

Only an individual who does not show  a mental disorder or  defect can  understand this conditions and cooperate with an  attorney, In cases where individuals try to feign mental disorder, a  Psychological testing is carried out so as to show  competency for such individual  to stand trial .  

6 0
3 years ago
It is the people`s way of life
elena-s [515]
Wdym man it is the people’s way of life?
8 0
3 years ago
A deeper level of organizational culture that consists of the beliefs and values shared by the organizations members is called a
postnew [5]

Answer:A CORE CULTURE

Explanation:

Core culture refers to values of an organization and this is found in Edgar Schein's model of Organizational culture.

Core culture is made up of three P's from the five P's which can be best depicted in a formula as: Core culture =Purpose+Philosophy+priorities

The organization needs to have a crucial purpose, a diffrent and long lasting Philosophy and strategic priorities. These are the ethos that will stabilize the organization and they need to be well known in the organization. They will act as a guidance to employees within work and out of work. These principles and values are characteristics that defines the organization through its employees even in the outer world. Which set them apart from other companies.

3 0
3 years ago
The risk-as-feelings hypothesis suggests that ____.
AlekseyPX
The risk-as-feelings hypothesis suggests that people's judgments about risk are overly conscious (with not enough attention paid to automatic assessments.
This hypothesis includes emotions as an anticipatory factor, namely feelings at the moment of decision making and e<span>xplains a wide range of phenomena that have resisted interpretation in cognitive-consequentialist terms.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In this discussion, you will discuss whether new nations depend on strong governments to succeed. Take a position on whether str
    9·1 answer
  • How many county's are there in ga
    7·2 answers
  • A pencil falls off a desk what moves the pencil toward the floor .
    14·1 answer
  • A child has learned that her grandparents ignore rather than reward her tantrums. Which of the following operant principles are
    10·1 answer
  • Which Supreme Court procedure involves justices discussing a case,
    9·1 answer
  • What are the effects of blind imitation​
    13·1 answer
  • Who is the youngest quarterback to win a superbowl
    13·1 answer
  • Barcilona in Spain neither has very hot nor cold climate . Why?​
    13·1 answer
  • Read The Dark Days:
    14·1 answer
  • true or false: the chief functions of the parietal lobe include voluntary motor functions, memory, mood, emotion, social judgmen
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!