Environmental markets can support international collaboration on energy technology to stable destiny strength materials and mitigate their environmental impact, such as via improved energy.
<h3>What do you understand about environmental markets?</h3>
Environmental markets can be defined as a progressive coverage method to leverage investment for environmental conservation on non-public lands. They can function as a supplement to conventional conservation programs.
thus, Environmental markets can support international collaboration on energy technology to stable destiny strength materials and mitigate their environmental impact, such as via improved energy.
learn more about environmental markets:
brainly.com/question/26950905
#SPJ1
Answer:
A) $424,000
Explanation:
Madison Corporation's current earnings and profits for 20x3 would be:
reported taxable income - accrued federal income taxes + regular depreciation - E&P depreciation + net capital loss carryover =
$400,000 - $136,000 + $200,000 - $60,000 + $20,000 = $424,000
Answer:
the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is $5,632.73
Explanation:
The computation of the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is as follows:
= $1,075 × (1.08^3) + $1,210 × (1.08^2) + $1,340 × (1.08^1) + $1,420 ×(1.08^0)
= $1,354.19 + $1,411.34 + $1,447.20 + $1,420
= $5,632.73
Hence, the future value of the cash flow in year 4 is $5,632.73
The same is to be considered and relevant
The easiest function available in MS Access to begin collecting data quickly is to use a pre-designed Template.
<h3>What is
pre-designed Template in MS Access?</h3>
Basically, the Ms Access is a database app that helps to store information for reference, reporting and analysis.
The pre-designed Template makes collection of data faster because the query, tables are already designed for instant use.
Hence, the Option B is correct since the easiest function available in MS Access to begin collecting data quickly is to use a pre-designed Template.
Read more about MS Access
<em>brainly.com/question/24643423</em>
Answer:
The appellate court ruled in favor of Bad Frog (lower court had ruled in favor of the New York State Liquor Authority) arguing that the label did not portray or concern an unlawful activity, and the state's authority couldn't prove it was protecting children from vulgar images.
The initial problem related to the repeated denial of the New York State Liquor Authority to approve Bad Frog's label even after the company had changed the label to make it less obscene. Bad Frog sued the New York State Liquor Authority and the District Court ruled against them. Then Bad Frog appealed and won.
