Answer:
A). He will not perform well due to increased arousal.
Explanation:
Arousal is described as the physiological state of being attentive, wake, or reactive to stimuli that result in increased heart rate and blood pressure along with the readiness or activeness to respond.
As per the given question, 'John's would not be to perform well due to the increased arousal' as he would be in an extreme state of sensory alertness with the elevated heartbeats and blood pressure that would burden him to perform well and make him nervous. This would mar him from focusing on the sport as his entire conscious sense is devoted to 'being alert'. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
The topic sentence expresses the main idea of the paragraph combined with the writer’s attitude or opinion about the topic. Good topic sentences contain both a main idea and a controlling idea, are clear and easy to follow, use engaging vocabulary, and provide an accurate indication of what will follow in the rest of the paragraph.
Explanation:
The dissenters in the flag-burning case and their supporters might at this juncture note an irony in my argument. My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of our self-conception and that commitment to it requires the rejection of official dogma. But how is that admittedly dogmatic belief different from any other dogma, such as the one inferring that freedom of expression stops at the border of the flag?
The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self-contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly at odds with our commitment to freedom of conscience. The controversy surrounding the flag-burning case makes the case well.
The controversy will rage precisely because burning the flag is such a powerful form of communication. Were it not, who would care? Thus were we to embrace a prohibiton on such communication, we would be saying that the 1st Amendment protects expression only when no one is offended. That would mean that this aspect of the 1st Amendment would be of virtually no consequence. It would protect a person only when no protection was needed. Thus, we do have one official dogma-each American may think and express anything he wants. The exception is expression that involves the risk of injury to others and the destruction of someone else`s property. Neither was present in this case.
"Mighty” reflects how powerful and influential the speeches were to Douglass in a way that “great” would not.
<em>Mighty</em> means possessing power or authority. These elements are not exactly part of the definition of the word <em>great</em>, which simply means large, remarkable, or predominant. With <em>mighty</em>, there is a connotation of significance and impact. Indeed, the narrator tells us that these speeches fascinated him ("unabated interest") and influenced his thinking ("they gave tongue to interesting thoughts of my own soul").
You punctuate,and Use proper Grammar.
