Given: We have the given figure through which we can see
LK=16,
KJ=10,
LM=24,
MN=15
To Find: Whether KM || JN and the reasoning behind it.
Solution: Yes, KM || JN because data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21ac3/21ac361c2e9c3ec365fc9b650799ce5e58a82b2e" alt="\frac{16}{10}= \frac{24}{15}"
Explanation:
For this solution, we use the concept of Similar Triangles.
Now, KM || JN if ΔLKM ~ ΔLJN (i.e., if ΔLKM is similar to ΔLJN).
Now, ∠MLK=∠NLJ
To prove similarity of the two triangles, we have to show that the sides are proportional. In other words, LK:KJ = LM:LN
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0f58/b0f58fe5ee0aeb80d84af8c1d3aef7851e130ae8" alt="LK:KJ=LM:LN\\\\ \frac{LK}{KJ} =\frac{LM}{LN}\\\\\frac{16}{26}= \frac{24}{39}\\\\"
which is true as both sides simplify to data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ad4f/7ad4fd1174636eb3f37e765cff9c0110f32a2419" alt="\frac{8}{13}"
Thus, we see that ΔLKM ~ ΔLJN (i.e., if ΔLKM is similar to ΔLJN).
Therefore, KM || JN.
To come to the reasoning, notice that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d80d6/d80d68fcff0360236ce1a413110f39d167190ca8" alt="\frac{LK}{LJ} =\frac{LM}{LN}\\\\\frac{LK}{LK+KJ} =\frac{LM}{LM+MN}\\\\\frac{LK+KJ}{LK} =\frac{LM+MN}{LM}\\\\1+\frac{KJ}{LK}=1+ \frac{MN}{LM}\\\\\frac{LK}{KJ} =\frac{LM}{MN}"
In other words, data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21ac3/21ac361c2e9c3ec365fc9b650799ce5e58a82b2e" alt="\frac{16}{10}= \frac{24}{15}"
Answer: 6 minutes
Step-by-step explanation: the 52 seconds rounds up to a full minute so it is 5.52 rounded up to 6 minutes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6adbc/6adbcf03417d3eb543f6326bd42f644a56d9adfc" alt="4 - 5 / 2 * (1/10x) = 1\\"
The first step is to identify the order in which the equation must be solved, by following PEMDAS (you might know it as BEDMAS):
Parenthesis (or Brackets)
Exponents
Multiplication and Division
Addition and Subtraction
My advice would be to add parenthesis, following these rules, if you are not very good at finding them immediately by sight.
So:
![4 - 5 / 2 * (\frac{1}{10x}) = 1\\\\4 - [(5/2)*(\frac{1}{10x})]=1\\\\4-(2.5*\frac{1}{10x})=1\\\\4-\frac{2.5}{10x}-1=0\\3-\frac{x}{4}=0\\\frac{x}{4}=3\\x=3*4\\x=12](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=4%20-%205%20%2F%202%20%2A%20%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10x%7D%29%20%20%3D%201%5C%5C%5C%5C4%20-%20%5B%285%2F2%29%2A%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10x%7D%29%5D%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C4-%282.5%2A%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10x%7D%29%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C4-%5Cfrac%7B2.5%7D%7B10x%7D-1%3D0%5C%5C3-%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B4%7D%3D0%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B4%7D%3D3%5C%5Cx%3D3%2A4%5C%5Cx%3D12)
We check our answer:
![x=12\\4 - [(5 / 2) * (1/10)*(x)] = 1\\4 - [(5 / 2) * (\frac{1}{10}) * (12))] = 1\\4 - [2.5 * (\frac{1}{10})*12] = 1\\4 - [(\frac{2.5}{10})*12] = 1\\4 - [(\frac{1}{4})*12] = 1\\4 - 3 = 1\\1=1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%3D12%5C%5C4%20-%20%5B%285%20%2F%202%29%20%2A%20%281%2F10%29%2A%28x%29%5D%20%3D%201%5C%5C4%20-%20%5B%285%20%2F%202%29%20%2A%20%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10%7D%29%20%2A%20%2812%29%29%5D%20%3D%201%5C%5C4%20-%20%5B2.5%20%2A%20%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B10%7D%29%2A12%5D%20%3D%201%5C%5C4%20-%20%5B%28%5Cfrac%7B2.5%7D%7B10%7D%29%2A12%5D%20%3D%201%5C%5C4%20-%20%5B%28%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%29%2A12%5D%20%3D%201%5C%5C4%20-%203%20%3D%201%5C%5C1%3D1)
We are right!
So,
.
Answer:
60
Step-by-step explanation:
, $&7%"""%- &xgsfx,, 77$""$66"'++
A.50*9.8
B.50*1.6
C.45.359237
D.45.3*1.6