Answer:
we can conclude that there is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean score in 2010 differs from the mean score in 2009.
Step-by-step explanation:
H0 : μ = 582
H1 : μ < 582
Test statistic :
T = (xbar - μ) ÷ σ/√n
Xbar = 515 ; n = 20 ; σ = 120
T = (515 - 582) ÷ 120/√20
T = -67 / 26.832815
T = 2.50
Pvalue at t score = 2.50 ; df = 19 is 0.0187
At α = 0.0187
Pvalue > α ; Hence, we fail to reject the Null
Hence, we can conclude that there is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean score in 2010 differs from the mean score in 2009.
It could mean something with measurements
If 80% are women, then 20% are men
20% of what equals 880
0.20x = 880
x = 880/.20
x = 4400
check..
men : 20% of 4400 = 0.20(400) = 880
women : 80% of 4400 = 0.80(4400) = 3520
totaling : 3520 + 880 = 4400
so there are a total of 4400 workers
Answer:
Minimum value of f(x) = -1.
Step-by-step explanation:
We convert it to vertex form:
x^2 - 6x + 8
= (x - 3)^2 - 9 + 8
= (x - 3)^2 - 1
The minimum value occurs when (x - 3)^2 = 0 because a square has a minimum value of zero ( it cannot be negative for real values of x).
So the function has a minimum value of -1.
Answer:
No.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio of the lengths of the vertical sides from A to B is 2/4 which equals 1/2.
The ratio of the lengths of the horizontal sides of A to B is 4/11.
Since 4/11 is not equal to 1/2, figure B is not a scale copy of figure A.
