Answer:
<u>greater than what it was before</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Remember</em>, a tornado usually causes significant structural damages to houses within its area of impact., and this requires running expenses to repair the damage.
Hence,<u> since the term </u><u>expenditure, </u><u>also implies expenses; we can expect the total expenditure on housing after the tornado to be </u><u>greater than</u><u> what it was before the tornado since families would be paying for repairs.</u>
Step-by-step explanation: To solve for x in this literal equation, I would first distribute the C through the parentheses to get y = cx + cb.
Now subtract cb from both sides to get y - cb = cx.
Finally, divide both sides by c to get y - cb / c = x.
The answer to the question is always.
First, let's make these two into equations.
The first plan has an initial fee of $40 and costs an additional $0.16 per mile driven.
Our equation would then be
C = 40 + 0.16m
where C is the total cost, and m is the number of miles driven.
The second plan has an initial fee of $51 and costs an additional $0.11 per mile driven.
So, the equation is
C = 51 + 0.11m
where C is the total cost, and m is the number of miles driven.
Now, your question seems to be asking for one mileage for both, equalling one cost. I would go through all the steps I've taken to try and find this for you, but it would probably take hours to type out and read. In short, I'm not entirely sure that an answer like that is possible in this situation, simply because of the large difference in the initial fee of the two plans, along with the sparse common multiples between the two mileage costs.
