Answer:
a. For each country, graph the production possibilities frontier. Suppose that without trade the workers in each country spend half their time producing each good. Identify this point in your graphs.
b. Who has the comparative advantage in the production of shirts? What about for computers?
- China has the comparative advantage in the production of shirts, while the US has the comparative advantage in the production of computers.
c. If these countries were open to trade, which country would export shirts? Give a specific numerical example and show it on your graphs. Which country would benefit from trade?
- China would export 50 million shirts in exchange for 5 million computers (or more if they can). Trade would benefit the US since it will only need to trade 5 million computers in exchange for 50 million shirts, and it will still have 15 million computers that it can consume or trade with come other country.
d. Explain at what price of computers (in terms of shirts) the two countries might trade.
- the minimum and maximum prices would be 5 to 10 shirts per computer. If the price of shirts per computer is 10 or near 10, then the US wins more. If the price of shirts per computer is 5 or near 5, then China wins more.
Explanation:
opportunity cost of producing 1 shirt in the US = 20/100 = 0.2 computers
opportunity cost of producing 1 computer in the US = 100/20 = 5 shirts
opportunity cost of producing 1 shirt in China = 10/100 = 0.1 computers
opportunity cost of producing 1 computer in China = 100/10 = 10 shirts
without trade:
- total production of shirts in the US = 50 million
- total production of computer in the US = 10 million
- total production of shirts in China = 50 million
- total production of computer in China = 5 million
with trade:
- total production of computers in the US = 20 million
- total production of shirts in China = 100 million
Answer:
1. Must Gidgits Galore provide its employees with benefits? No
2. Does Gidgits Galore have to implement a payroll tax for unemployment, workers' compensation, or Social Security? Yes
3. Gidgits Galore is concerned about hiring employees from other countries whose language skills may not be proficient and is considering hiring only native English speakers. Is this a good idea? No
4. Does the Commerce Clause have an effect on Gidgits Galore? Yes
5. Can Gidgits Galore face any repercussions if it disregards Title VII? Yes
6. Gidgits Galore is concerned about hiring employees from other countries whose language skills may not be proficient and is considering hiring only native English speakers. Would this represent "disparate treatment"? Yes
7. Gidgits Galore wants a "young and hip" workforce. Is there a problem if it chooses not to hire anyone over the age of forty? Yes
8. Gidgits Galore wants to put a section in its updated employment manual preventing employees from taking more than thirty days from work without pay, regardless of the reason. Is this a good idea? No
9. What if Gidgits Galore wants to add a provision to its employee manual preventing employees from forming a union? Can this be done? No
Explanation:
Edge 2021
Answer:
The answer is : People consume the goods they produce
Explanation:
Say's law could also be refereed to as Say's law of markets in Classical economics states that supply itself creates its own demand which is equivalent to people consuming what they produce.
Answer:
$720 and $180
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:
Premium for 3 years = $2,700
So, premium for 1 year = $2,700 ÷ 3 = $900 per year
Manufacturing operation percentage = 80%
Selling and administrative operation percentage = 20%
So, Premium for manufacturing operation = $900 × 80% = $720
And Premium for selling and admin operation = $900 × 20% = $180
Answer:
The statement represents the Straw Man fallacy.
Explanation:
A Straw Man fallacy is a version of an argument that is misrepresented, simplified so that it will be easier to defeat. It replaces or represents whatever actual argument is being made. The Straw Man fallacy in some cases is not provided intentionally. They could also be the result of talking about something with little to no previous knowledge of it.
Thus, as the evolutionary theory does not only proposes that humans come from monkeys with less hair and bigger brains, <em>the statement is oversimplifying the different researches on that topic</em> falling into a Straw Man fallacy.
