The water pollution in Central Asia comes from agricultural sources. Pesticides and fertilizers that are used to grow crops seep into the soil. Rain and drainage systems transport the polluted soil to rivers, infecting the water supply with hazardous chemicals. East Asia is much more industrial than Central Asia; water pollution in East Asia is caused by waste from factories and ships. Industrial waste and leaked fuel have caused serious damage to the animal and sea life in many East Asian rivers.
The explanation for the source of water pollution in central asia and the way it compares withe he source of the polluted water in east asia is:The pollution of the waters of central Asia is caused majorly by fertilizers and pesticides because the economy of the countries of central Asia relays in a big way to the development of agricultural activities. While, on the other hand, the pollution of the water of the southeast Asian countries comes from the residues or the remains of factories that produce goods to export. Because the economy of those countries is based on the manufacture of goods.
Explanation:
The reasons for this answer are two. First of all central Asia is composed y countries like Kazakstan, Uzbekistan, among others that are not countries involved in economical activities of the transformation of primary resources. On the other, they focus on the production and sale of primary resources. While Southeast Asia is composed of countries like Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia that have followed the economy of china to rivalry it.
Urban development can magnify the risk of environmental hazards such as flash flooding. Pollution and physical barriers to root growth promote loss of urban tree cover. Animal populations are inhibited by toxic substances, vehicles, and the loss of habitat and food sources
Spartans were trained from the time they were seven years old to be warriors. Girls as well as boys were taught in the art of war. The Spartans also lived a very austere lifestyle so that they would be used to long millitary campaigns.
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.
