Answer:
<em><u>The equality is true</u></em>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em><u>x+(y+z)=(x+y)+z</u></em>
<em><u>x+(y+z)=(x+y)+zwhen we plug in -4/15 for x,-4/5 for y</u></em>
<em><u>x+(y+z)=(x+y)+zwhen we plug in -4/15 for x,-4/5 for yand 17/8 for z,we get</u></em>
<em><u>x+(y+z)=(x+y)+zwhen we plug in -4/15 for x,-4/5 for yand 17/8 for z,we get-4/15+(-4/5+17/8)=(-4/15+-4/5)+17/8</u></em>
<em><u>x+(y+z)=(x+y)+zwhen we plug in -4/15 for x,-4/5 for yand 17/8 for z,we get-4/15+(-4/5+17/8)=(-4/15+-4/5)+17/817/24=17/24</u></em>
<em><u>x+(y+z)=(x+y)+zwhen we plug in -4/15 for x,-4/5 for yand 17/8 for z,we get-4/15+(-4/5+17/8)=(-4/15+-4/5)+17/817/24=17/24so this equality is true</u></em>
Answer:No
Step-by-step explanation:
-10-2x = -2(5+x)
2x-10 = 2(x-5)
Answer:
Around 54% is what I would say.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
C: p < 0.01
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
Spearman rank Correlation Coefficient: rs = 0.53
sample size: n = 13 pairs
Now, from the table attached, tracing n = 13 and locating a corresponding value of rs = 0.53 which falls in between 0.484 and 0.56. Thus, we can see that p is greater than the nominal significance value of 0.05 but less than 0.01.
Thus, correct answer is p < 0.01