Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
What is the largest of 3 consecutive integers such that the sum of the first and third is equal to three times the second?
3 consecutive angles
= x, x + 1, x + 2
We are told in the question that:
the sum of the first and third is equal to three times the second
a + c = 3b
x + x + 2 = 3(x + 1)
2x + 2 = 3x + 3
3x - 2x = 2 - 3
x = -1
The largest of the three numbers is the third number
= x + 2
x = -1
x + 2 = -1 + 2
The third and largest number is 1
K=6.5
We move all terms to the left:
k-(6.5)=0
We add all the numbers together, and all the variables
k-6.5=0
We move all terms containing k to the left, all other terms to the right
k=6.5
Option A: 
Option C: 
Option F: 
Solution:
Given expression is 
.
Option A:
Hence is equivalent expression of .
Option B: 
Hence is not equivalent expression of .
Option C:
(proved in option A)
Hence is equivalent expression of .
Option D: 
Hence is not equivalent expression of .
Option E: 75
75 is a whole number.
Hence 75 is not equivalent expression of .
Option F:
(proved in option A)
Hence is equivalent expression of .
Therefore, 
are all equivalent expressions of .
Answer:
the rise/ run would be 3/3
Step-by-step explanation:
. The number is either 10^1 or 10^3 or 10^ 5 or . . . .
<span>If it is more than 10, then it is not 10^1. The next possibility is 10^3which is 1000, which has factors 2, 5, 10, 20, 25, 40, 50, 80, . . . . . </span>
<span>What constitutes a "multiplication sentence" exactly ? This is not a standard mathematical term. Do you mean "reduce it to its prime factors" ? </span>
<span>1000 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 5 x 5 x 5 </span>
<span>which is a lot more than 4 factors. Or not, if you write it as 2³ x 5³. </span>
<span>But you could say the same about 100 000 = 2^5 x 5^5 </span>
<span>or about 10 000 000 = 2^7 x 5^7 </span>
<span>Take your pick. This is a very badly stated question. </span>
