2 years ago

Did the benifits of Roman expansion outweighed the costs?

1 answer:

3 0

No,the benefits of the roman expansion did not out weigh the cost. there were a lot more costs of the roman empire expansion versus the benefits one cost was that when rome was people were sold into slavery.

You might be interested in

A celebrity actress experiences ever-increasing levels of professional acclaim following each successful movie role. Yet with ea

Slav-nsk [51]

Answer: the answer is E

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

One challenge to the trait approach to personality is that traits may not be as stable across situations as we think they are. A

Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

hshshjagajzgajjGJgakGiUAKHAJAGizgzkagzkzgzjzgziGajaiYJZ

5 0

3 years ago

What is "protector of the kingdom" in ancient Persia

Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

A Persian governor of a province was known as a satrap ("protector of the kingdom" or "keeper of the province")

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose that there is a news report of a shortage of gasoline what does this mean if the market system were left alone how would

Serhud [2]

A shortage is a term used to refer to the supply not being enough to accommodate the needs of all its users. This means that the gasoline supply may run out if not replenished and used properly. The shortage be eliminated by replenishing the supply or limiting the activities that would require the use of gasoline.

8 0

2 years ago

Under the Missouri Compromise of 1820:

forsale [732]

Answer: <em>Option (D) is correct.</em>

Explanation:

Missouri Compromise of 1820 is referred as the legislation which provided for Maine admission to US as a free state alongside Missouri as a slave state, therefore maintaining the equilibrium of authority between North and South in US Senate. The 16th US Congress passed this legislation on 3rd March 1820, and the President at that time James Monroe ratified it on 6th March, 1820.

6 0

3 years ago