I think it's A. The admission of Missouri as a slave state was controversial in the Senate because t<span>he Senate was a Pro-Slavery</span>
Chambliss critiques the notion of talent or natural ability as it relates to excellence because the natural ability is combined with a lot of hard work.
In his first book, Crime and the Legal Process, Chambliss argued that black criminal abuse was far more prominent than middle-class whites and that African Americans had a disproportionately high rate of the arrest.
According to Chambliss's article "A Sociological Analysis of the Laws of Vagrant", the increased severity of penalties for vagrancy was due to major changes in the economy and social structure.
Chambliss critiques' major contribution to criminology was to increase our knowledge of who makes laws, how and why they are enforced, and who benefits.
Learn more about Chambliss at
brainly.com/question/14928762
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The actions that the Qin Dynasty would take against a person who wrote a book with their own opinions, about how they did not agree with the government were lethal.
Yes, during the Qin Dynasty in China, there was no freedom of speech or freedom of the press, or something similar. Quite the opposite.
Emperors during the Qin Dynasty were dictators and ruled an absolutists form of government. That is why they were the Emperors.
If someone expressed a critic or opposition against teh Emperor, he could be killed immediately. As simple as that. The Emperor was the absolute ruler and his word was the law.
This is of course subjective, but in general, compromise if often wise
in political situations in which people share resources. It is not wise when violations of basic human rights are involved.
