Answer:
true, false, true, true
Step-by-step explanation:
The set names in this diagram have nothing to do with exponents, radicals, and polynomials. We'll take the diagram at face value.
(a) The labels on the sets seem to be appropriately placed.
__
(b) "Some" in this context means "any or all of the set". Since all of the circle representing integers is outside the rectangle representing irrational numbers, it is TRUE that some integer are not irrational numbers.
No part of the circle representing whole numbers is inside the rectangle representing irrational numbers, so it is FALSE that some whole numbers are irrational numbers.
A portion of the circle representing integers is outside the circle representing whole numbers, so it is TRUE that some integers are not whole numbers.
Every part of the circle representing whole numbers is inside the rectangle representing rational numbers, so it is TRUE that all whole numbers are rational numbers.
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to get a common denominator of 10
-4/5 *2/2 = -8/10
-8/10 +3/10
-5/10
Divide the top and bottom by 5
-1/2
So, let's see, Amber made 3 penalty shots off 4, now, 3 out of 4 is 75% or 3/4. So she's 75% of the time effective.
Lindsay has made 4 out of 6 penalty shots, 4/6 or 2/3, that's about 66% effectiveness.
Li has made 2 out of 3 penalty shots, that's 2/3, that's about the same 66% effectiveness.
so, which fraction is highest 3/4, or 2/3 or 2/3? neverminding the percentages, let's multiply all by the LCD, let's see from 4, and 3, and 3, the LCD is 12.
so, let's multiply all of them by 12, to get rid of the denominator, to see which is highest.

notice, Amber has the higher effectiveness rate, to make it through in the penalty kick.