The answer is A because the slope for cherries is greater
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation of a line in slope-intercept form:
m - slope
b - y-intercept → (0, b)
We have the x-intercept = 4 → (4, 0), and y-intercept = 5 → b = 5.
Therefore we have the equation:
Put the coordinates of x-intercept to the equation:
<em>subtract 4m from both sides</em>
<em>divide both sides by (-4)</em>
Finally we have the equation of a line if slope-intercept form:
The standard form:
Convert:
<em>multiply both sides by 4</em>
<em>add 5x to both sides</em>
You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Answer:
its going to be 20 years
Step-by-step explanation:
1.036
Answer:
reflection only
rotation, then translation
Step-by-step explanation:reflection only rotation, then translation
