Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Given that we have the change in temperature over 7 hours and we are looking for the change over 1 hour, we can divide the total change in temperature by 7. Thus, the change in temperature would be 
.
Additionally, this can be solved by equations:
By using two different methods, we can determine that the change each hour was equal to 42/7 C° per hour.
Answer:
Easiest to pick (0, 0) and (1, 1) probably, then slope is 1.
Step-by-step explanation:
Rise over run for (0, 0) and (1, 1) is rise up 1 and run over 1, so 1/1.
This means slope is 1
Answer:
They are skew lines.
Step-by-step explanation:
Which statement is true about lines a and b?
They are parallel lines.
They are perpendicular lines.
They are skew lines.
They will intersect.
As they both are in different directions they are skew lines .
Skew lines are not parallel neither they .They are also not co planar i.e they lie in different planes.
We have two plane Q and R . We have two line a and b on the different planes Q and R. Both planes are parallel but the lines a and b are in different directions. Therefore they are skew lines . They do not intersect and are also not parallel neither co planar.
