Explanation:
There are two problems that need to be solved in the scenario above: the increase in team conflicts and the retention of valuable employees who are the cause of conflicts. In these two situations, as recently hired as vice president of human resources for an advertising agency, the ideal would be to try to understand how the people management process that occurred before his arrival at the company was carried out, and from there, find strategies for resolve the two main types of conflicts that occur at the advertising agency.
Some solutions arise from the principle of revising the HR policy and establishing a more direct and facilitated communication with employees, in order to increase the employees' perception of a management focused on the employee's well-being and open to feedbacks.
Another solution for reducing conflicts in teams is the assessment and analysis of the profile of each member individually and in a group, in order to monitor the individual and collective performance of each and define assignments according to their skills, generating greater integration between teams and appreciation of each employee, which increases engagement and motivation at work, reducing conflicts and turnover.
Answer:
Statement # 1: False
Statement # 2: True
Statement # 3: False
Statement # 4: True
Explanation:
Lets look at each statement provided in the question and determine which of them is true or false.
Statement # 1 is false. First things first, the interest on this loan amount is higher which is at 4.15%. This is compared to the interest of 4% applicable on loan option 1. Secondly, there is a four year interest only option. This means that for 4 years there will be no repayments of the principal amount which means that the interest of 4.15% will continue to apply on the entire loan amount for these 4 years. In loan 1 however, principal repayments will reduce the principal amount after the 1st year which would further reduce the interest payment in the second year.
Statement # 2 is true. Loan 2 has an interest only period for the first 4 years. During this year you will only pay the 4.15% interest whereas in loan option 1, you will pay 4% interest AND the principal amount. The effect would offset once principal payments start in loan 2 but it would still mean that payments would be minimized in the first few years.
Statement # 3 is false. One of the advantages of having a loan with an interest free clause is that you can pay it off faster than a conventional loan. Since both the loans are fully amortizing, the principal payments would be different but would both result in the principal being repaid in the full 30 year tenor. Any extra payment that you wish to make would be counted towards principal payment in each loan option. However, for loan 1, the total monthly payments you make would remain the same. For loan 2, the extra payments that you make will continue to lower the monthly payments in way of interest which would allow you to save up more to pay more off in principal. The interest only period will also allow you to arrange extra funds during the IO period and repay the principal further. With loan 1, you will continue to make the same monthly payment until the end.
Statement # 4 is true. A fixed payment is being made each year by way of interest and principal repayments and will remain the same till the loan is fully amortized at maturity. In loan 2 on the other hand, a larger balloon payment will start 4 years later since only interest is paid in the first 4 years. So basically you may lower in the first 4 years and more in the remaining years.
Answer:
Option D is correct.
Explanation:
In the option 1 we receive $250,000 but in the second option we receive total amount that is $200,000. But their is an issue which is time value money. If the inflation is lower then it is possible we receive higher value in real terms. If we have an opportunity to invest in a project or company with required return provided then it would be the best option to invest in. Overall option D is correct because the level of question is High School.f
The greatest justification for firm resources being committed to vertical integration (either forward or backward) is to add considerably to a company's technological capabilities, strengthen the company's competitive position, and/or increase its profitability.
A family of financial indicators known as profitability ratios is used to evaluate a company's potential to create profits over time in relation to its revenue, operational expenses, balance sheet assets, or shareholders' equity using information from a particular point in time. Efficiency ratios, which take into account how successfully a company uses its resources internally to generate income, can be contrasted to profitability ratios (as opposed to after-cost profits). Most profitability ratios show the company's performance by showing a higher value as compared to that of a competitor or to the same ratio from a prior period. The most insightful comparisons of profitability ratios are those made with comparable businesses, the company's own past, or industry averages.
Learn more about profitability here
brainly.com/question/15036999
#SPJ4
The total cost that is incurred by producing 100 doughnuts is equal to the sum of the variable cost and the fixed cost. The total variable cost is,
total variable cost = ($2/doughnut)(100 doughnuts) = $200
The total cost is,
Total cost = total variable cost + total fixed cost
TC = $200 + $500 = $700
Equating the cost and the revenue,
TC = TR
$700 = (100)(x)
The value of x from the equation is $7.
ANSWER: $7.