The answer to this question is the "WAIT-LIST CONTROL". When a researcher is examining the effects of an experimental surgery on epilepsy randomly assigns epileptic patients to three different conditions. The first condition is that the participants receive the surgery. The second condition is that the patients receive the medication while third condition, the patients receive the surgery one month after the other group of patients. The third group of patients who need to wait for another one month is in the WAIT-LIST CONTROL and can only be accommodated after the other group is done.
Answer:
The correct answer is Direct order.
Explanation:
Many times a day we receive and give orders. When we entrust a specific function to our employee or subordinate, how do we do it? By giving a direct order to execute it or we use what we call delegation. Through the delegation, we entrust this employee not only to do what has been communicated to him, but also to take responsibility from start to finish, reporting once the order has been executed to whoever has given it.
The rest of it will be: price equals marginal cost. But this indeed is not true. The most accepted idea is that for a monopolistically competitive firm the average revenue and price are the same quantity. Now, when a monopolistically competitive firm is in long-run equilibrium, then the marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost.
Answer: Negative Sales Mix Variance
Explanation:
With regards to the above question, the company has a negative sales mix variance. First and foremost, we should know that the sales mix variance simply has to do with the difference between the actual sales mix and the budgeted sales mix of a company or organization.
From the question, there'll be negative sales mix variance and this will bring about a reduction in the revenue of the company as the budgeted sales will be lesser than actual sales. Therefore, Profit also reduces.
Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
