This is how I understood the question
Hope I helped!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
U need to think
The experimental research has two key advantages over correlational studies.
1. The possibility of random assignment
2. Causal connections can be assumed.
<h3>
What benefit does experimental research have over correlational research?</h3>
Correlational studies merely examine the data that already exists, whereas experimental studies give the researcher the opportunity to influence the study's factors. Researchers can make inferences about how changes in one variable affect changes in another through the use of experimental investigations.
The factors in a correlation study are out of the control of the researcher or research team. The researcher merely measures the information she discovers in the outside world. She can then determine whether changes in one are related to changes in the other, or if the two variables are correlated. In such a study, experimenters gather existing data and use statistical methods to examine it, such as economic statistics from governments. The findings of correlation studies can lead to hypotheses that can be verified through a more focused experimental one.
To learn more about correlational research visit:
brainly.com/question/14375687
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer for the first equation is,
B. 11
The answer for the second equation is,
D.none of these.
Answer:
n > -14
Step-by-step explanation:
Firstly, you use the distributive property;
-12 - 6n > 72
Then, since 12 is negative, you add 12 to both sides;
-12 - 6n > 72
+12 +12
-6n > 84
Then you divide both sides by -6 to get n > -14.
Shoot, hold on; this is an edit; did you mean that 72 is greater than -6(2 + n) or did you accidentally flip the sign in the picture? Hopefully I did what you needed.
