Answer: Option (B) is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Isotopes are the substances or species that contain same number of protons but different number of neutrons.
As it is known that atomic number means the total number of protons present in an atom. Hence, this also means that in isotopes atomic number of the species is same.
For example, isotopes of hydrogen are 
, 
, and 
.
Isotopes of only heavier elements are radioactive in nature as they have large difference in the number of protons and neutrons.
Thus, we can conclude that the statement isotopes of the same element have the same atomic number but differ in their atomic masses, is correct.
Answer:
36 KJ of heat are released when 1.0 mole of HBr is formed.
Explanation:
<em>By Hess law,</em>
<em>The heat of any reaction ΔH for a specific reaction is equal to the sum of the heats of reaction for any set of reactions which in sum are equivalent to the overall reaction:</em>
H 2 (g) + Br 2 (g) → 2HBr (g) ΔH = -72 KJ
This is the energy released when 2 moles of HBr is formed from one mole each of H2 and Br2.
Therefore, Heat released for the formation of 1 mol HBr would be half of this.
Hence,
ΔHreq = -36 kJ
36 KJ of heat are released when 1.0 mole of HBr is formed.
Answer:
Explanation:
Given that:-
Moles of K = 1.10 moles
Moles of Te = 0.55 moles
Moles of O = 1.65 moles
Taking the simplest ratio of the moles of the elements as:-
K : Te : O
1.10 : 0.55 : 1.65
2 : 1 : 3
Empirical formulas is the simplest or reduced ratio of the elements in the compound. So, the empirical formula is:-
Answer:
If the colors in a chromatography are able to dissolve and travel up a paper wick, what kind of chemical property do the colors have when mixed with rubbing alcohol?
(You may need to search "Chemical Properties")
Moral relativism considers that something, such as abortion, can only be right or wrong in relation to one or another moral framework. Morality is then a human invention. The relevant moral principles are thus nothing but conventions that result from a process of tacit moral bargaining through which some groups can exert pressure on others in an effort to change the current moral conventions. This encourages the view that "anything goes" and that morality is just a matter of opinion. Relativism makes dialogue pointless, assuming that there is no binding truth or that partners in the dialogue are saying the same thing in different ways.
