Answer:
Its Mai
Step-by-step explanation:
I promise I know why
Answer:
27.2 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's set up a ratio that represents the problem:
Object's Height (ft) : Shadow (ft)
Substitute with the dimensions of the 34 foot pole and its 30 foot shadow.
34 : 30
Find the unit rate:
The unit rate is when one number in a ratio is 1.
Let's make the Shadow equal to one by dividing by 30 on both sides.
Object's Height (ft) : Shadow (ft)
34 : 30
/30 /30
1.13 : 1
Now, let's multiply by 24 on both sides to find the height of the tree.
Multiply:
Object's Height (ft) : Shadow (ft)
1.13 : 1
x24 x24
27.2 : 24
Therefore, the tree is 27.2 feet tall.
Answer: D.) This is an example of inductive reasoning because a general conclusion is reached based on a specific example,
Step-by-step explanation: Inductive reasoning simply refers to making conclusion about a specific subject or topic from patterns or insights derived from related examples. In the scenario above, the conclusion reached encompasses the overall full time 4 years college student. However, this conclusion was inferred based on a specific example comprising of only a randomized sample of 1200 full time 4 years college students in 100 campuses. random. The example failed to incorporate every student, Hence, the conclusion is induced as the choice of a sample of students may not convey the choice or decision of all.
Deductive reasoning meanwhile follows that a generally established fact is used to make conclusion about a specific example.
Answer:
see steps
Step-by-step explanation:
New price was increase from 100% to 109% at £1800.
By proportionality,
old price / 100% = 1800 / 109%
Cross multiply to get
old price = $1800 * 100% / 109% = £1651.38
Answer:
try A
Step-by-step explanation:
