All categories

2 years ago

Less massive molecules tend to escape from an atmosphere more often than more massive ones because

1 answer:

6 0

We can confirm that less massive molecules tend to escape from an atmosphere more often than more massive ones because they are moving faster.

<h3>How does speed help molecules escape?</h3>

This has to do with the energy of the molecules. Speed comes with its higher kinetic energy. This higher level of energy helps the molecules to escape by giving them enough energy to overpower the force of gravity acting upon them in the atmosphere.

Therefore, we can confirm that less massive molecules tend to escape from an atmosphere more often than more massive ones because they are moving faster.

To learn more about molecules visit:

brainly.com/question/19922822?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in

What spheres are part of the earths system

Mama L [17]

Answer:

northern and southern sphere

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A force gives a 5.0 kg object an acceleration of 2.0 m/s 2. The same force would give a 20 kg object an acceleration of _____. 0

Oksi-84 [34.3K]

m = 5 kg

a = 2 m/s²

to find the force that accelerates the 4 kg object @ 2 m/s²

F = ma = 5 kg x 2 m/s² = 10 N

To find what acceleration 10 N would give a 20 kg object

a = F/m = 10 N/20 kg = 0.5 m/s

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A 15-lb block B starts from rest and slides on the 25-lb wedge A, which is supported by a horizontal surface. Neglecting frictio

xxTIMURxx [149]

The angle of the wedge is 30°.

Answer:

5.88 ft/s

Explanation:

a) The block will slide down due to it's weight.

initial velocity u= 0

final velocity, v

acceleration, a = g sin 30° = 32 ft/s²× sin 30° = 16 ft/s²

Sliding displacement, s = 3ft

Use third equation of motion:

$v^2-u^2 = 2as$

substitute the values and solve for v

$v^2-0 = 2\times 16 \times 3 =96 ft^2/s^2\\v = 9.8 ft/s$

b) Use conservation of momentum:

Initial momentum of the system = 0

final momentum = (15) ( 9.8)+ (25)(v')

v' = 5.88 ft/s

3 0

3 years ago

Imagine an infinite earth with a hole dripped through it. You fall in and accelerate at g~10m/s/s. How long until you reach the

Soloha48 [4]

An object with non-zero mass (even negligible mass is non-zero) will never reach the speed of light. Due to relativistic effects, each "unit" of acceleration becomes less effective at increasing your velocity (relative to some other object, of course) as your relative velocity approaches the speed of light.

And even if there was a way, If you would accelerate to the 99,99% of the speed light in just 1 second, you would experience a G-force of aprox. 30,600,000 g's which is enough to kill you in a few seconds

6 0

3 years ago

Si pudieras viajar a la Luna:

Nostrana [21]

Answer:

i) Distancia, ii) La cinta métrica es impracticable.

Explanation:

i) El concepto físico que se construye únicamente del punto de salida y el punto de llegada a la Luna es el concepto de desplazamiento, definido como la distancia en línea recta de un punto en el espacio con respecto a un punto de referencia (la Tierra en este caso).

La distancia puede involucrar trayectorias curvilíneas entre los puntos mencionados.

ii) Por último, el uso de una cinta métrica es impracticable debido a la cantidad de material a utilizar y los efectos gravitacionales, electromagnéticos y mecánicos que inducen a una deflexión o una ruptura de esa cinta debido a la magnitud de la distancia entre las superficies del planeta y el satélite, respectivamente.

En este caso, es mejor utilizar la medición con tecnología láser, basadas en el fenómeno del electromagnetismo.

4 0

3 years ago