I don't think so as long as you make it apparent that the information comes the same source. So citing over and over again is unnecessary as long as it's clear that the information is from the same website or source. If you can't make it clear that they are from the same website source, it would a safe choice to continue to cite to avoid allegations of plagiarism.
Answer:
sorry I don't really know :P
Explanation:
Answer:
From the data we know that runner A and runner B are 11 km apart from the start because (6+5) km
So the runner from the east direction has distance as unknown km, rate= 9 k/h ; time= d/r=x/9 hr
So runner towards the west will be
distance = 11-x, rate= 8 k/h, time = d/r = (11-x)/8
So equating east and west time we have
x/9= (11-x)/8
8x=99-9x
17x=99
x=5.92 km
That is the distance covered by runner towards the east and he will meet the runner toward the west at
6-5.92=0.08 km west of the flagpole.
This seems like a calculus problem. I'm assuming you would use cos and sin. so here's the vertical component +10.0m/s multiplied by sin60 = 8.66 rounded to the hundreths place. Now for horizontal, that would be +10.0m/s multiplied by cos60 = 5. hope this helped.
