There's no such thing as "stationary in space". But if the distance
between the Earth and some stars is not changing, then (A) w<span>avelengths
measured here would match the actual wavelengths emitted from these
stars. </span><span>
</span><span>If a star is moving toward us in space, then (A) Wavelengths measured
would be shorter than the actual wavelengths emitted from that star.
</span>In order to decide what's actually happening, and how that star is moving,
the trick is: How do we know the actual wavelengths the star emitted ?
Answer:
The radius of the gold nucleus is 7.1x10⁻¹⁵m
Explanation:
The nearest distance is:
(eq. 1)
Where
z = atomic number of gold = 79
e = electron charge = 1.6x10⁻¹⁹C
k = electrostatic constant = 9x10⁹Nm²C²
energy of the particle = 32 MeV = 5.12x10⁻¹²J
At the potential energy is zero, all the energy will be kinetic energy:
Where
m = 4 mp = mass of proton
Replacing in equation 1
Answer:
There are three ways an object can accelerate: a change in velocity, a change in direction, or a change in both velocity and direction.
Explanation:
Answer:
H = 1/2 g t^2 where t is time to fall a height H
H = 1/8 g T^2 where T is total time in air (2 t = T)
R = V T cos θ horizontal range
3/4 g T^2 = V T cos θ 6 H = R given in problem
cos θ = 3 g T / (4 V) (I)
Now t = V sin θ / g time for projectile to fall from max height
T = 2 V sin θ / g
T / V = 2 sin θ / g
cos θ = 3 g / 4 (T / V) from (I)
cos θ = 3 g / 4 * 2 sin V / g = 6 / 4 sin θ
tan θ = 2/3
θ = 33.7 deg
As a check- let V = 100 m/s
Vx = 100 cos 33.7 = 83,2
Vy = 100 sin 33,7 = 55.5
T = 2 * 55.5 / 9.8 = 11.3 sec
H = 1/2 * 9.8 * (11.3 / 2)^2 = 156
R = 83.2 * 11.3 = 932
R / H = 932 / 156 = 5.97 6 within rounding
