1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimaraw [331]
3 years ago
12

In engineering, economic cost is a decision-making tangible factor. Group of answer choices True False

Engineering
2 answers:
salantis [7]3 years ago
8 0
Economic cost is a rescission making tangible factor true
polet [3.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Economic cost is a very important factor to consider in decision making in Engineering. It is part of the four essential elements involved in decision making in engineering analysis.

Economic cost is part of the criteria to evaluate alternatives considering the time value of money by estimating a specific measure of worth of estimated commodity cost over a period of time.

Other Factors to consider in Engineering Economics as related to the Economy are:

(1) Time of Occurence of Cash flows

(2) Interest Rates

(3) Cash Flows

You might be interested in
Jnjn freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee pointtttttttttt
kvasek [131]

Answer:

thx

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
While discussing VIN numbers, Technician A says that the first digit of the VIN identifies the country where the vehicle was man
ruslelena [56]
Usually the first digit of the vin id’s the country it was built. So technician A would be correct. That’s usually how it is. Hope this helps. Please let me know if this is incorrect
4 0
3 years ago
A thick aluminum block initially at 26.5°C is subjected to constant heat flux of 4000 W/m2 by an electric resistance heater whos
Yanka [14]

Given Information:

Initial temperature of aluminum block = 26.5°C

Heat flux = 4000 w/m²

Time = 2112 seconds

Time = 30 minutes = 30*60 = 1800 seconds

Required Information:

Rise in surface temperature = ?

Answer:

Rise in surface temperature = 8.6 °C after 2112 seconds

Rise in surface temperature = 8 °C after 30 minutes

Explanation:

The surface temperature of the aluminum block is given by

T_{surface} = T_{initial} + \frac{q}{k} \sqrt{\frac{4\alpha t}{\pi} }

Where q is the heat flux supplied to aluminum block, k is the conductivity of pure aluminum and α is the diffusivity of pure aluminum.

After t = 2112 sec:

T_{surface} = 26.5 + \frac{4000}{237} \sqrt{\frac{4(9.71\times 10^{-5}) (2112)}{\pi} }\\\\T_{surface} = 26.5 + \frac{4000}{237} (0.51098)\\\\T_{surface} = 26.5 + 8.6\\\\T_{surface} = 35.1\\\\

The rise in the surface temperature is

Rise = 35.1 - 26.5 = 8.6 °C

Therefore, the surface temperature of the block will rise by 8.6 °C after 2112 seconds.

After t = 30 mins:

T_{surface} = 26.5 + \frac{4000}{237} \sqrt{\frac{4(9.71\times 10^{-5}) (1800)}{\pi} }\\\\T_{surface} = 26.5 + \frac{4000}{237} (0.4717)\\\\T_{surface} = 26.5 + 7.96\\\\T_{surface} = 34.5\\\\

The rise in the surface temperature is

Rise = 34.5 - 26.5 = 8 °C

Therefore, the surface temperature of the block will rise by 8 °C after 30 minutes.

5 0
2 years ago
Mahamad Siddiqui sent false emails and letters of recommendation on behalf of individuals without their permission to nominate h
shusha [124]

Mahamad Siddiqui sent false emails and letters of recommendation on behalf of individuals without their permission to nominate himself for the Waterman Award at the National Science Foundation. His earlier emails were offered where he had solicited letters were offered as evidence. Siddiqui claimed that content of earlier emails was hearsay. Do the earlier emails come in is given below

Explanation:

1.Mohamed Siddiqui appeals his convictions for fraud and false statements to a federal agency, and obstruction in connection with a federal investigation.   Siddiqui challenges the district court's admission into evidence of e-mail and foreign depositions.

2.On February 18, 1997, Jodi Saltzman, a special agent with the NSF interviewed Siddiqui at Siddiqui's office at the University of South Alabama.   During the interview, Siddiqui signed a statement admitting that he had nominated himself for the Waterman Award, but that he had permission from Yamada and von Gunten to submit forms on their behalf.   Siddiqui also acknowledged in the statement that Westrick had recommended Siddiqui for a different award, the PECASE Award, but that Siddiqui had changed the wording of the letter to apply to the Waterman Award.   Siddiqui was indicted on April 29, 1997.

3.Siddiqui opposed the taking of the depositions on the grounds that the witnesses' personal presence at trial was necessary, and that Indian travel restrictions for its citizens residing abroad prevented him from traveling to Japan and Switzerland.   Specifically, Siddiqui asserted that because of religious persecution in India his travel to Japan or Switzerland related to the criminal action would put his family members still living in India at risk.   The magistrate judge ruled that the government had carried its burden of showing that Yamada and von Gunten would be unavailable to appear at trial, and instructed that Siddiqui's fear of obtaining a travel visa from India because of the threat of persecution of family members should not preclude the taking of the foreign depositions.

4.Yamada's deposition was taken in Japan on March 6, 1998.   At government expense, Siddiqui's counsel attended the deposition and cross-examined the witness, but was not in telephonic contact with Siddiqui during the deposition.   Yamada testified that on February 1, 1997, she received an e-mail stating that if she received a phone call from the NSF to “please tell good words about me.”   Yamada testified that she knew the e-mail was from Siddiqui because the name on the e-mail had Siddiqui's sender address, and it ended with the name “Mo” which Siddiqui had previously told her was his nickname, and which he had used in previous e-mail.

5.Yamada later admitted to Saltzman that she had not given Siddiqui permission to sign, but had made the earlier representation because she thought Siddiqui would go to jail.

6.During cross-examination of Yamada at the deposition, Siddiqui's counsel introduced an e-mail from Yamada to Siddiqui.   This e-mail contained the same e-mail address for Siddiqui as the e-mail received by Yamada and von Gunten apparently from Siddiqui.

7.Von Gunten's video deposition was taken in Switzerland.   At government expense, Siddiqui's counsel attended the deposition and cross-examined von Gunten.   During the deposition, Siddiqui was in communication with his counsel by telephone.   Von Gunten testified at the deposition that he had not submitted a letter of recommendation in favor of Siddiqui for the Waterman Award, and that he had not given Siddiqui permission to submit such a letter in his name.

8 0
3 years ago
Pls help and solve this problem. I don't have an idea to solve this.
lions [1.4K]

Answer:

MIS HIEVOSTES bbbbbbbbbbbb MIS HUEVOTES

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which pendulum will.mobe faster​
    13·1 answer
  • How was math used to determine new origami crease plans?
    10·1 answer
  • Please answer the following questions.
    9·2 answers
  • Air,in a piston cylinder assembly, is initially at 300 K and 200 kPa.It is then heated at constant pressure to 600 K. Determine
    12·2 answers
  • Table 1(a) shows the marks obtained by 40 students in an examination
    11·1 answer
  • Diffrerentiate y=cos^{4} (3x+1)
    5·1 answer
  • YO CUTIE! HELP MEEEEEE! Hazardous waste is a category that includes all of the following EXCEPT
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following machine parts always require
    12·1 answer
  • Identify the prefixes used in the International System of
    15·1 answer
  • The ratio of the volume of charge admitted at n. T. P. To the swept volume of the piston is called.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!