The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
[/tex]
This changes to a mix fraction
3 [tex] \frac{5}{9}
Answer:
x=-2, y=5. (-2, 5).
Step-by-step explanation:
15x-4y=-50
3x-2y=-16
---------------
15x-4y=-50
-5(3x-2y)=-5(-16)
------------------------
15x-4y=-50
-15x+10y=80
-------------------
6y=30
y=30/6
y=5
3x-2(5)=-16
3x-10=-16
3x=-16+10
3x=-6
x=-6/3
x=-2
This is similar to the other question you posted. Follow the same steps as before.
First find g(41).
g(41) = sqrt{x - 5}
g(41) = sqrt{41 - 5}
g(41) = sqrt{36}
g(41) = 6
We now find f(6).
f(6) = -7(6) + 1
f(6) = -42 + 1
f(6) = -41
Answer:
(fºg)(41) = -41
Did you follow?
The answers, that you are seeking for my friend, are a, b, and d
