- The expression was rewritten using the commutative law of addition.
- Line 1 says 3 + 4, which could be represented using dots as ••• + •••• for a total of 7 dots.
- Line 2 says 4 + 3, which could be represented using dots as •••• + ••• for a total of 7 dots.
<h3>What is the
commutative law of addition?</h3>
The commutative law of addition is also referred to as the law of cumulative addition and it states that if two numbers are added together, then, the outcome is equal to the addition of their interchanged position because addition is considered as a binary operation.
This ultimately implies that, the sum of addends would always be the same (equal) regardless of their arrangement in accordance with the commutative law of addition. Mathematically, the commutative law of addition can be represented using the following formula:
A + B = B + A.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the given expression was rewritten using the commutative law of addition.
In conclusion, Line 1 says 3 + 4, which could be represented using dots as ••• + •••• for a total of 7 dots. Line 2 says 4 + 3, which could be represented using dots as •••• + ••• for a total of 7 dots.
Read more on commutative law of addition here: brainly.com/question/778086
#SPJ1
A point in quadrant 4 could be (-4,-2)<span />
Answer:
If you want to know what the probability is to get at least one Heads, then that is the same as the probability of all the events (100%, or 1) minus the probability of getting all Tails.
There are 100 coins. 99 are fair, 1 is biased with both sides as heads. With a fair coin, the probability of three heads is 0.53=1/8. The probability of picking the biased coin: P(biased coin)=1/100.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
It would be 20
Step-by-step explanation:
As we can see, the sequence starts from 5 and increases by three each time. In fact, one possible formula for that sequence could be:
Let's confirm the formula by evaluating the first 6 terms:
Determine whether the relation is a function. {(−3,−6),(−2,−4),(−1,−2),(0,0),(1,2),(2,4),(3,6)}
Gennadij [26K]
Answer:
The relation is a function.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order for the relation to be a function, every input must only have one output. Basically, you can't have 2 outputs for 1 input but you can have 2 inputs for 1 output. Looking at all of the points in the relation, we see that no input has multiple outputs, so the answer is yes, the relation is a function.
