There are 5.66 moles of hydrogen in the sample of talc(hydrated magnesium silicate).
Given,
Talc formula is 
moles of magnesium = 8.5 moles
The stoichiometry of magnesium and hydrogen is 3 : 2,
So 3 moles of magnesium is equivalent to 2 moles of hydrogen.
Then 8.5 moles of magnesium is equivalent to 
=5.6666 moles
<h3>Talc </h3>
Talc(hydrated magnesium silicate), often known as talcum, is a type of clay mineral made up of hydrated magnesium silicate, having the formula Mg3Si4O10(OH)2. Baby powder is made of powdered talc, frequently mixed with corn starch. This mineral serves as a lubricant and thickening agent. It serves as a component in paint, pottery, and roofing materials. It serves as a key component in many cosmetics. It can be found as foliated to fibrous aggregates and in a remarkably uncommon crystal form. It is foliated with a two-dimensional platy form, has a flawless basal cleavage, and an irregular flat fracture.
Talc(hydrated magnesium silicate), the softest mineral, is assigned a value of 1 on the Mohs scale of mineral hardness, which is based on scratch hardness comparisons.
Learn more about Talc here:
brainly.com/question/24082743
#SPJ4
Animal cells have a centrosome and lysosomes, whereas plant cells do not.
Answer:
-7.34 kilo Joules is the change in enthaply when 20.0 grams of nitrogen triiodide decomposes.
Explanation:
Mass of nitrogen triiodide = 20.0 g
Moles of nitrogen triiodide = 
According to reaction, 2 moles of nitrogen triiodide gives 290.0 kilo Joules of heat on decomposition ,then 0.05063 moles of nitrogen triiodide will give :
-7.34 kilo Joules is the change in enthaply when 20.0 grams of nitrogen triiodide decomposes.
Answer:
48%
Explanation:
Based on Gay-Lussac's law, the pressure is directly proportional to the temperature. To solve this question we must assume the temperature increases and all CO2 remains without reaction. The equation is:
P1T2 = P2T1
<em>Where Pis pressure and T absolute temperature of 1, initial state and 2, final state of the gas:</em>
P1 = 10.0atm
T2 = 1420K
P2 = ?
T1 = 730K
P2 = 10.0atm*1420K / 730K
P2 = 19.45 atm
The CO2 reacts as follows:
2CO2 → 2CO+ O2
Where 2 moles of gas react producing 3 moles of gas
Assuming the 100% of CO2 react, the pressure will be:
19.45atm * (3mol / 2mol) = 29.175atm
As the pressure rises just to 24.1atm the moles that react are:
24.1atm * (2mol / 19.45atm) = 2.48 moles of gas are present
The increase in moles is of 0.48 moles, a 100% express an increase of 1mol. The mole percent that descomposes is:
0.48mol / 1mol * 100 = 48%
Answer:The process of science is iterative.
Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.
Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …
