It means that religion will never meddle with running the nation, and it can't figure out who's chosen for specific positions and who isn't. For instance, they can't dismiss qualified possibility for having distinctive religious convictions.
The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is a proviso inside Article VI, Clause 3. By its plain terms, no administrative officeholder or worker can be required to cling to or acknowledge a specific religion or tenet as an essential to holding a bureaucratic office or a national government work. It promptly pursues a provision requiring all government and state officers to take a pledge or attestation to help the Constitution. This statement contains the main express reference to religion in the first seven articles of the U.S. Constitution.
<em>Yes, it was a very wise thing to do.</em> Whenever we create new content that we want to present to the public, we have to acknowledge any other material that might contain similar information to ours. Sometimes, this might happen on purpose, like when we research a topic and we find information in other sources that will enhance our research. In this case, we cite our sources as references.
In the case of Jerome, the overlap was accidental. However, if he is aware of it, it is still a good strategy to acknowledge it for several reasons.
Listeners will be aware of the overlap, so they will be less likely to accuse him of plagiarism (claiming another person’s idea are our own).
They will also be more patient with redundant information, instead of getting bored.
It will show that Jerome cares about the proper acknowledgement of sources of information, so they are more likely to trust the rest of his speech.
Finally, the audience is aware of the fact that Jerome could not have predicted this overlap, so they will appreciate his resourcefulness for having a strategy to work around it.
Medicalization of deviance is from the social trend that over the decades the growing influence of psychiatry and medicine transformed moral and legal issues into medical matters.
<h3>Medicalization of Deviance</h3>
- The process through which non-normative or morally abhorred characteristics of appearance (fat, unattractiveness, shortness), belief (mental disease, racism), and behavior (drinking, gambling) are brought under medical control is referred to as the medicalization of deviance.
- It is possible to describe medicalization as the process through which some parts of daily life start to be viewed as pathological rather than as medical issues.
- The process of classifying and categorizing non-normative and deviant behavior as a medical issue, usually a disease, is referred to as the "medicalization" of deviant behavior.
- The growing classification of deviance as a sickness coexists with the expanding use of medicine as a tool of social control, typically in the form of medical intervention.
To learn more about Medicalization of Deviance refer to:
brainly.com/question/4123399
#SPJ4
The supreme court answers that question
