Title IX aims to prevent any sort of discrimination in schools that receive federal funding based on sex.
Title IX:
- Is a federal law that was enacted in 1972
- Aims to prevent discrimination based on sex in any educational program and institution that receives federal funding
Sex was not specifically protected in the 1964 Civil Rights Act in terms of educational institutions. Title IX was therefore passed to rectify this and the federal government enforces this by making action against sex based discrimination, a requisite for receiving federal funding.
In conclusion, Title IX aims to prevent sex-based discrimination in schools and other educational institutions and programs.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/16080067. </em>
Based on the given information Deliah's a correct and most favorable filing status for the tax year 2021 is Married filing jointly. Thus the correct option is B.
<h3>What is Tax?</h3>
A tax is referred to a certain amount that is collected by the government of any country from its citizens which is later on used in the development process of the country including building hospitals, roads and maintaining transportation, and so on.
It is revealed in the case study that Delilah was a married woman with two dependent children at the time of her husband's passing in August 2021. She has never wed. The most advantageous file status for Deliah for the upcoming tax year 2021 is Married filing jointly.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about tax, here:
brainly.com/question/16423331
#SPJ1
The complete question is Probably
Deliah was married with two dependent children when her husband died in August 2020. She has not remarried. Deliah's correct and most favorable filing status for Tax Year 2020 is:
Single.
Married filing jointly.
Head of household.
Qualifying widow(er).
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
