Answer:
If you look over the steps you can see that until 4x + x + 3 = 18, evertything is dandy. But the step after that 4x + x =21 seems a bit fishy.
Think about it they subtract 3 from both sides so the first side is correct
4x + x, but they added 3 to the other side:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b176/3b1768fa56548e5db59e9806d70c29700f262c77" alt="(4x+x+3) - 3 = 18 - 3\\4x+x = 15"
not
4x+x = 21
Then we solve for 4x + x = 15
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e080b/e080b5b5d79cb7b3c3bdadbe9ee5bb9d7f18e403" alt="5x = 15\\x = \frac{15}{5} \\x = 3"
To solve for y we use :
y = x+3
y = 3+3 = 6
so (3,6) is the right answer
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation: a= E
b=D
c=A
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
because if you divied 100 by 400 it is a lot less than the others
<span>x 2 3 4
f(x) 5.5 7 8.5 </span>
The first function is linear. When you subtract 5.5 from 7, you get 1.5 and when you subtract 7 from 8.5 you also get 1.5. That's how we know it's a linear function because there's clearly pattern. HOWEVER, if you had 5.5, 7, and 9 that would not be a linear function. Why? Because when you take away 7 from 9 you get 2. In order for it to be a linear function you have to get the same exact number when you subtract.
<span>x 0 3 6
f(x) 1 8 64</span>
The second function is exponential because when you divide you get the exact same number. 8/1 = 8 and 64/8 = 8. So this is exponential. But if you had 72 instead of 64 it would not be an exponential function because there has to be a pattern.
I hope this makes sense. Btw I had this question on my test too and this is correct.