Hi there!
Assuming "Find the product" means multiplying (4x-3) by (3x+8) and factor to it's simplest form the answer would be:
12x²+23x-24
The way you solve this is by using the distributive property of multiplication as shown below:
Start by multiplying -3 from (4x-3) by everything in (3x+8)
3x*(-3) = -9x
8*(-3) = -24
Once you've done that you then multiply everything 4x
4x*8 = 32x
4x*3x = 12x²
(Note: when multiplying two of the same variables like x it means you are multiplying x by itself which is the same as x²)
When you put all of this together it looks like this
12x²+32x-9x-24
from there we combine like terms
32x-9x = 23x
to get
12x²+23x-24
I hope this helps!
God bless,
ASIAX
Answer:
Solving for t : t=5+2r/5
Solving for r : r=-25/2+5t/2
Step-by-step explanation: Move all of your terms that don't contain r to the right side and solve. Move all terms that don't contain t to the right side and solve.
Hope this helps you out! ☺ I just solved it and I don't have any choices to go off of and so I just solved it. Sorry if it's wrong. ☺
The experimental probability can be represented as a fraction of the number of times a five was not the result over the total number of times the cube was rolled.
The answer would be 288/350 or 144/175.
Answer: The product of (-a + 3)(a + 4) is: -a^2-a+12
Step-by-step explanation:
(-a+3)(a+4) = -a*a-a*4+3*a+3*4
=-a^{2} -4a+3a+12
now just simply combine..
=-a^2-a+12
the answer is -a^2-a+12
Answer:
C) fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic congestion
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct option is - C) fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic congestion
Reason -
Option A is incorrect because the statistics can not be incorrect.
Option B is incorrect because they are not talking about the city.
Option C is correct because Urban rail reduces congestion.
Option D is incorrect because the opposers cited the example of one city and the supporters are presenting evidence in the case of that city itself.
Option E is incorrect because they are providing an explanation for why the commuters data given by opposers is not relevant. The opposers talked about commuters.
