1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rodikova [14]
1 year ago
10

A researcher finds that people who own more than two cars have bigger homes, more garage space, and make more money than people

who own only one or two cars. Therefore, the researcher concludes that having more than two cars causes people to have homes with bigger garages. What principle best exemplifies why the researcher's conclusion is not justified
Social Studies
1 answer:
Nataly_w [17]1 year ago
4 0

The principle that best shows why the conclusion by the researcher is not justified is the alternative explanations principle.

<h3>What is the alternative explanations principle?</h3>

This is a principle in research that posits that a researcher cannot conclude that a phenomenon is caused by something when other things could have been the cause.

In this case, the researcher concluded that having two cars caused people to have bigger garages when it could simply be that they wanted a bigger garage for storage.

Find out more on alternative explanations at brainly.com/question/8946311.

#SPJ12

You might be interested in
How were Egypt and Nubia's empires different
Tcecarenko [31]
There were not many differences between Egypt and Nubia, but the ones that existed were significant enough to constitute their authority as separate ancient states. The Nile River, the lifeblood of the two civilizations and their founding site, had great impact on both societies through their use of it for irrigation and transportation. Despite the difference in availability of information and written records between the two civilizations, scholars today are still able to infer, and sometimes figure out, what the differences between the societies were based off recovered artifacts. Egypt had many more written records than Nubia, probably because Egypt adopted hieroglyphic writing about 3200 BCE, and Nubia adopted their own writing system of Meroitic about 500 BC, though this Meroitic writing still is not understandable by scholars. The differences, nonetheless, were visible and pronounced in each society, and led to different economic, social, and political standards and cultural practices in each state.
The economic differences between Nubia and Egypt were mostly seen through trade, though they also revealed themselves through other means. First of all, the two countries traded different items and served as trade “corridors” to each other. Egypt had no route to the rest of Africa except through Nubia, and Nubia had no route to Asia except through Egypt. They depended on one another for their cooperation, though that isn’t to say they went without their quarrels.
The next aspect of Nubian and Egyptian difference, despite their abundant similarities, was their social and political organization. At the bottom of the social hierarchy came peasants and slaves; these supplied the hard labor for the agricultural societies of Egypt and Nubia. Next came the governmental and military workers. Egypt was organized into a complex bureaucracy that gave positions of power based on merit, not birth. This gave more people of common birth a chance to advance in society, a feature very different from most ancient societies. Almost immediately after the peasants and government workers came the rulers, or ruler in Egypt’s case. The Egyptian leader, the pharaoh, was theoretically an absolute leader, which did not give much room for a class of nobles as in other ancient societies. The pharaohs built giant tombs for themselves called pyramids, which still stand today as testament to their power. Meanwhile, Nubia was organized into a kingdom, which meant the ruling class was made up of a king and his nobles who supervised the lower classes. Nubia’s social organization was resemblant of Mesopotamia’s, despite the fact that it was farther away than Egypt. Nubian rulers did not build giant pyramids, but still organized lavish smaller pyramids for themselves with riches stored inside. Despite these differences, patriarchal societies emerged in both Egypt and Nubia. Men governed their households and their countries, with little exception, though women still had more influence in society than in Mesopotamia.
Finally, the differences in culture between Egypt and Nubia were obvious and notable. Writing, specifically, was a major cultural difference between these two societies. Egypt, a country famous for its pictographic and ideographic hieroglyphic writing, developed this form of communication by 3200 BCE, possibly as a result of Mesopotamian influence. However, hieroglyphics were cumbersome and time-consuming to write in, so Hieratic emerged at almost the same time as hieroglyphics as a more simple and condensed way of writing than the “priestly” script. While Nubia initially adopted all Egyptian ways of writing and communication, they later developed their own way of communicating. This new form of communication was called Meroitic, and it was so unique from all other ancient languages that scholars are still not able to understand it today. The religions of the two societies were also very different, though Egyptian influence shone through in Nubian religion. Egyptian religion was largely based off sun cults, such as those of Amon, Re, and Aten, though cults such as those of Osiris also emerged. Mummification was also a practice frequented by the wealthy and influential in Egypt, as it was believed to facilitate the transition of the body from one life to another. Nubian religious practices, while adopting some of the same gods and rituals as Egypt, also developed its own distinct gods and customs.
<span>The differences of Egypt and Nubia were not clear on the surface. Egypt wielded great influence over Nubia in its early, weaker days, in all aspects of the Nubian society. However, later in history, Nubia was able to build more of its own culture, and ended up being a distinct, individual, and important society in ancient history.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Discuss TWO ways people react to social changes
olganol [36]

Answer:

There are usually three ways that people react to change: Be non-active. Be reactive. Be proactive and positive

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Greg, Donna, and Paul are on the five-member Benefits Task Force that is researching options for the new benefits package. Over
Nata [24]

Answer:

groupthink                                                                      

Explanation:

Groupthink: In social psychology, the term "groupthink" is described as one of the psychological phenomena that generally occurs within a particular group consisting of different individuals whereby the choice related to the conformity and harmony in the given group leads to create or develop dysfunctional or an irrational "decision-making outcome".

It was first utilized by one of the social psychologists named Irving L. Janis during 1972.

In the question above, the given statement is an example of "groupthink".

5 0
3 years ago
What are the primary ways that Georgia raises funds? Check all that apply. private donations fees and licenses outside funding p
Alja [10]

Answer:

Income taxes are the cornerstone of Georgia's revenue system, accounting for half of all state funds. Sales taxes are the second largest revenue source, representing slightly less than a quarter of annual collections.

Explanation:

Brainilest please

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Kant, it is morally permissible to treat a server in a restaurant as a means to the end of buying food. Select one:
lana [24]

According to Kant, if we treat a cashier as a means to the end of buying food, an action that is permissible is achieved. Therefore, it is true.

<h3>Who is a cashier?</h3>

It should be noted that a cashier facilitates money transactions for customers through accepting cash, cheques, credit, or debit.

According to Kant, it is morally permissible to treat a server in a restaurant as a means to the end of buying food.  According to Kant, sometimes we use people to achieve some end.

Learn more about cashier on:

brainly.com/question/18637447

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which of gardner's tasks involves anticipating client outcomes for single clients or families and helping them formulate their v
    12·1 answer
  • Gina Brown injures herself a saw left on the sidewalk of a neighbors house, and she sues the neighbor, James Blue, for negligenc
    8·2 answers
  • Which of these factors would strengthen demand for a nation’s currency on the international market? select all that apply. high
    14·2 answers
  • Who was the Babylonian ruler responsible for the fall of Assyria and Nineveh
    5·1 answer
  • Mr. Jones has been teaching social skills to his fourth grade class. After learning the skills, Mr. Jones’ students are using th
    13·1 answer
  • Why is frictional unemployment of relatively little concern to economists or government officials?
    7·1 answer
  • 3. What perception do people around the world have of South Africa? Why do you think they have that perception?
    5·1 answer
  • Look at this image. These paintings were found in:
    8·1 answer
  • What is the main argument Thomas Paine makes concerning the relationship between Great Britain and its American colonies?
    5·1 answer
  • Dr. nguyen is analyzing the duration, tone, and loudness of infants' cries immediately after they receive their first inoculatio
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!