Answer: Check explanation.
Explanation:
Great!, Before delving into the solution to the question let us define JURISDICTION. Jurisdiction is the power to make judgement. However, there there are boundaries to jurisdiction in courts. So, let us answer the question.
(a). Pat wants to sue his next-door neighbor Dorothy, claiming that Dorothy promised to sell him the house next door: since both party, that is , Pat and Dorothy are not representing any federal body, there case should be in the STATE COURT.
(b). Paula should bring the case to the STATE COURT IN DALLAS.
(c). Since the land is in Ohio, Phil should file a lawsuit in Ohio court .
(d). This is a federal case and Pete should file his case under federal jurisdiction.
Answer:
I say Arraignment because that is where they meet their client, then after the Arraignment, they talk to their client.
The damages payable using the above-identified theory & recovery basis is 50000 tons.
<h3>What are damages?</h3>
It should be noted that damages are the remedy to be paid to a client as compensation.
In this case, Brogden shipped but Metro rejected the delivery of 50,000 tons of coal.
Therefore, the damages payable using the above-identified theory & recovery basis is 50000 tons.
Learn more about damages on;
brainly.com/question/25697446
#SPJ1
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Ambiguity in contracts can be voided if subjected to more than one interpretation and may be dismissed as evidence if the court has determined the Contract falls under ambiguity.
I think the answer is true
:):):):):)
