Answer:
Finished goods = $85,800
Ending inventory = $5,280
Explanation:
beginning WIP 400 units
$11,080
8000 units started
$80,000
units finished and transferred out = 8,000 + 400 - 600 = 7,800
ending inventory 600 units
80% complete
equivalent units = 7,800 + (600 x 80%) = 8,280
total costs = $91,080
cost per equivalent unit = $91,080 / 8,280 = $11
Finished goods = 7,800 x $11 = $85,800
Ending inventory = 480 x $11 = $5,280
Answer:
D
Explanation:
In the above scenario, Diane's decision to gather preference information for the product features is an example of her Determining Research Objectives. Thus option D is the right option.
Cheers
I will assume this is a true or false question, the answer is true. Requirements analysis, likewise called requirements engineering, is the way toward deciding client desires for another or altered item. These elements, called necessities, must be quantifiable, significant and point by point. In programming building, such necessities are frequently called utilitarian particulars.
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
