Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Answer:
- He can only catch old fish (past the reproductive age).
Explanation:
As per the given description, the strategy that the commercial fisherman can employ to ensure the sustenance of population of tuna fishes in long-term would be 'catching only the old fish past their reproductive age' as it would give time and space to tuna population present in the water to reproduce and multiply its population in the meantime. This technique is recognized as 'purse seining' where the fisherman would target the old fishes and reduce the bycatch of tuna fishes so that its over-exploitation could be held for a while and give them required time to regain their population.
If you are asking for the age of how old until you can do a hazardous job, i'm pretty sure the answer is 18 years old. You have to be 18 in order to do a hazardous job. If you are under that age, you cannot. But i have heard that you can do a job that is not hazardous at the age of 16 or 17. I hope this helped :)
Explanation:
Motivations for colonization: The French colonized North America to create trading posts for the fur trade. Some French missionaries eventually made their way to North America in order to convert Native Americans to Catholicism. ... The French in particular created alliances with the Hurons and Algonquians.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Judge Fujita is sentencing a defendant who is convicted of a felony crime that carries a mandatory sentence of four years in prison. Judge Fujita sentences the defendant to a one-year sentence instead. The judge had the option to modify the sentence under the presumptive sentence.
The presumptive sentence serves as a guideline to the judge when sentencing. It is when the judge decides the appropriate sentence to a specific crime. The presumptive sentence contains the number of years in jail and the kind of fines the judge can dictate. To do this, the judge takes into consideration other factors such as the criminal record of the defendant and the aggravating factors.
