Answer:
Explanation:
The comparison of psychological benefits to actual tangible costs depends on the individual in question. If the individual is constantly stressed to the point which the stress is affecting his/her health, work performance, mood, behavior around family, etc. then the tangible costs of going on vacation may be worth it. This is because a vacation would provide a moment of relaxation which would relieve all of that individual's stress and in doing so improve the individual's work performance, health, and overall quality of life. Therefore, the comparison between physical benefits to costs is always going to be a personal opinion.
Once a company reaches 50 or more employees, and meets any of the below criteria, it has 120 days to create an Affirmative Action Plan. Every year the company remains larger than 50 employees and meets the federal contracts guidelines listed below, it is required to update the plan to track changes in employee population and employee transactions.
In some instances, companies are required to implement an Affirmative Action Plan without a direct government contract. If government contractors purchase at least $50,000 worth of goods to fulfill their obligations on a government contract, then the goods’ seller is also subject to the OFFCP’s laws.
A prime example is a hardware company which sells screws to a company that builds Navy submarines. Although there’s no direct contract with the government for the hardware company, accepting the order as part of a government contract makes it a bill of lading, and if it exceeds $50,000 total revenue on those deals, then both sides must comply with Affirmative Action law.
Answer:
Neuronal Signal Propagation
Explanation:
Signal propagation is the movement of signals between neurons. The process of sending these signals takes place in two steps: along the cell ( action potential) and between cells (neurotransmitters).
Answer:
The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel
Explanation:
First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.
So, referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.
So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.
