1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qaws [65]
1 year ago
11

4x – 9y = 7

Mathematics
1 answer:
Bad White [126]1 year ago
8 0

What number would you multiply the second equation by in order to eliminate the x-terms when adding to the first equation?

It's 2 (to get - 4x & 4x + - 4x = 0)

What number would you multiply the second equation by in order to eliminate the y-terms when adding to the first equation?

It's 3 (to get 9y & - 9y + + 9y =0)

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
What type of function is represented by the table of values below?
vova2212 [387]

Answer

The type of function that is represented by the table of values below is C. linear

4 0
2 years ago
4) Which linear inequality represents the solution set graphed?
horsena [70]

Answer:

D)€÷√€€$&7$&7$&dy+&"&_

3 0
3 years ago
What is the Standard Deviation of the following set of data?
Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

34

Step-by-step explanation:

34 because i beleive so

5 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
Can someone please help :!
garik1379 [7]

Answer:

minimum

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the domain of F(x) = 2+3^x
    14·1 answer
  • Rectangle B is shown below. Nadia drew a scaled version of Rectangle B using a scale factor of 1/5 and labeled it Rectangle C wh
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!! IM STUCK!!
    14·2 answers
  • Solve m - 13 equals 8
    9·2 answers
  • Solve for y<br><br> 2x + y = 7 <br><br> 6x + 9 = 9y - 2x
    8·2 answers
  • Find the volume of the sphere. Round your answer to the nearest tenth.
    9·1 answer
  • How much does 1 pound of dog food cost using unit rates
    8·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me with these 2 please ! <br> I’ll mark you as a brainliest.
    7·1 answer
  • Some number subtracted by -6 is 41. Multiply this number by-3. Then divide
    6·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Csf%20Evaluate%5Cint%20log%20%5C%3A%20x%20%5C%3A%20dx" id="TexFormula1" title=" \sf Evalu
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!