Answer: C. 1200 hour
Explanation:
It is indeed 1200 hours because the units produced increased by 20% and therefore, theoretically, so should the time.
What Courtney is experiencing in the question is a process called service recovery.
It refers to a paradox where a customer will think highly of a company when the company has fixed the problem that the customer is facing from its service, compared to how the customer would perceive the company when it gives a non-faulty service.
Customer retention is mainly determined by how a company resolves a problem that a customer faces due to a faulty service or product.
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Variable costs = $28
Allocated fixed costs = $17
Selling price = $84
Due to acceptance of M offer, S would be got excess contribution margin per unit. Because acceptance selling price ($34) is greater than the variable cost per unit ($28).
We don't have any information about the fixed cost due to acceptance. Therefore, we assumed that fixed cost is not increased.
Increased contribution margin per unit:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= $34 - $28
= $6
For 3,000 units, Increased contribution margin = 3,000 × $6
= $18,000
Therefore, net income is increased by $18,000 when the offer is accepted.
Answer: purchase foreign currency in order to purchase a U.S. treasury bond.
Explanation:
Currency convertibility has to do with the degree in which the domestic currency of a particular country can be converted into the currency of another country.
Therefore, a citizen in a developing country with a currency policy of convertibility on the current account could engage in the purchase foreign currency in order to purchase a U.S. treasury bond.
Answer:
The correct answer is option a.
Explanation:
Taxes levied on either buyers or sellers are equivalent. In both cases, the tax creates a wedge. This wedge is the difference between the price that the buyers have to pay and the price that the sellers receive.
The price that the buyers have to pay increases while the price that the sellers receive decreases. But this tax wedge does not depend on whom the tax is levied, it depends on the elasticity of demand and supply. So whether the tax is levied on buyers or sellers, the tax wedge will remain the same.
The tax burden will be shared between both buyers and sellers. So it is incorrect to say that the taxes levied on sellers and taxes levied on buyers are not equivalent.
