Answer:
Beta= 1.17
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Shirley Paul's 2-stock portfolio has a total value of $100,000. $37,500 is invested in Stock A with a beta of 0.75 and the remainder is invested in Stock B with a beta of 1.42.
To calculate the Beta of the portfolio, we need to use the following formula:
Beta= (proportion of investment A*beta A) + (proportion of investment B*beta B)
Beta= (37,500/100,000)*0.75 + (62,500/100,000)*1.42
Beta= 1.17
Answer:
The answer is: D) They attract the largest FDI from MNEs. If you consider FDI´s share of the country´s GDP
Explanation:
The countries that are located in the base of the global economic pyramid are all underdeveloped and poor countries, so no North America, Europe, Japan, China, or Australia. If you consider the total nominal amount of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) by Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) in the world, the countries that receive the most of them usually have large economies or high GDP per capita (only Brazil is an exception) like the US, China, Belgium, Canada, France, Russia, Singapore, etc.
But if you consider FDI as a percentage of a country´s GDP the list of receiving countries varies a lot. The following is the list of the 10 countries with the greatest share of FDI to GDP in 2011 (UN 2011 report)
- Liberia
- Mongolia
- Hong Kong SAR (China)
- Sierra Leone
- Luxembourg
- Singapore
- Congo republic
- Belgium
- Chad
- Guinea
In this list you can find 6 countries that are extremely poor but very rich in natural resources (in this case minerals). So if consider the relative size of FDI in those economies, then it´s huge. Most FDI done on poor countries is directed to mining or oil corporations.
Given:
Principal = 11,000
return rate = 6%
term = 20 years
Without additional information, I can treat this problem as a simple interest problem.
Simple Interest = Principal * rate * term
Simple Interest = 11,000 * 0.06 * 20 years
Simple Interest = 13,200
11,000 + 13,200 = 24,200 total balance after 20 years.
Assuming that the interest is compounded once a year.
A = P (1 + i/n)^t*n
A = 11,000 (1 + 0.06/1)^20*1
A = 11,000 (1.06)^20
A = 11,000 * 3.207
A = 35,278.49 total amount after 20 years.
The amount involving compounding interest is greater than simple interest because in compounding interest, the interests earned in the previous years also earn its own interest. Whereas, in simple interest only the principal earns an interest.
An economist would conclude that when goods are not rationed by monetary price or lottery, other rationing mechanisms like waiting arises.
Here, many people were willing to wait for more than two hours to see the rare flower. The visiting was arranged in such a way that first come, first see. The rareness of the flower made no option but to wait in line to see it.
In an economist's perspective, he will compare the flower to the goods. There is rationing for food through monetary and lottery mechanisms. But if there were no mechanisms like this, then waiting will be the only way to consume goods. Here, because the flower was rare, it cannot be rationed by price. But we are still able to ration goods by price. If someday, there will be lack of goods, then the only rationing mechanism we could opt will be waiting in lines.
Learn more about rationing mechanisms at brainly.com/question/14938189
#SPJ4
Answer:
$5,400
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the estimated average income
Using this formula
Estimated average income=Expected total income yield/Useful life
Let plug in the formula
Estimated average income= $21,600 ÷ 4
Estimated average income= $5,400
Therefore the estimated average income is $5,400
