Stone criticizes the agency argument
because of the following reasons:
1.The law does not hold that directors
are mere agents of the shareholders
2. In the real world, the shareholders
do not select the directors
3. Why should the directors have more moral accountability
to the shareholders than to other people
Answer:
First of all, young invincibles are young people, usually between 18 and 34 years old, that expect to remain healthy and therefore are not willing to buy health insurance.
The problem is that effectively young invincibles use less health care than other age groups but they serve as a balance for people with preexisting conditions that use health care a lot.
When the amount of young invincibles that acquire insurance is too small compared to preexisting conditions groups, health care costs will increase due to adverse selection and health care premiums will also increase.
Answer:
Explanation:
Workable ethical theory that was violated was the ideology of justice. However if we look at SECE and IEEE COE, the clauses that have been violated are
SECE: Clause g. “Software engineers shall be fair to and supportive of their colleagues”
IEEE COE: Clause 3. “To be honest and realistic in stating claims or estimates based on available data”
By taking a gold spot instead of a green spot that he was entitled he has violated the overall rights of justice and has not supported his colleagues. He also has not been honest in his claims.
However, considering the overall view of ethics, the student did not have any choice and he did the right thing by parking at whichever spot available.
Answer:
The answer is Strength
Explanation:
SWOT analysis stands for:
S - Strength
W - Weakness
O - Opportunity
T - Threat.
In the question, strength captures the scenario. Strength is a resource that can be used as a competitive advantage to attract customers. Customers see this strength and they are attracted by it.
Other examples can be, respect, creativity etc.
