All categories

2 years ago

Write a hypothesis about the use of an object's physical

Physics

1 answer:

KengaRu [80]2 years ago

3 0

If the mass of the object and the volume of the object is determined;

Then, the density of the object is determined by taking the ratio of the mass and volume.

<h3>What is density of an object?</h3>

The density of an object is the ratio of the mass and volume of that object.

Mathematically;

Density = mass/volume

To determine the density of an object therefore, the physical characteristics of mass and the volume of the object are measured.

The mass of the object is obtained using a scale or a balance.

The volume of the object if a solid is obtained using a displacement bottle. If it is a liquid, a measuring cylinder is used.

The density of the object is then obtained by taking the ratio of the mass and the volume of the object.

In conclusion, the density of an object is determined from the volume and mass ratio.

Learn more about density at: brainly.com/question/1354972

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

The density of a solid material depends on two things .Name those two things

Amiraneli [1.4K]

Mass of an individual atoms or molecules

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Aquifers are an example of which two are spheres interacting?

mash [69]

<h2>Answer::</h2>

Humans (biosphere) built a dam out of rock materials (geosphere). Water in the lake (hydrosphere) seeps into the cliff walls behind the dam, becoming groundwater (geosphere), or evaporating into the air (atmosphere).','.

3 0

3 years ago

345nm=____mm<br>I need to see how to work the problem out

Amanda [17]

Answer:

3.45×10⁻⁴mm (or 0.000345mm)

Explanation:

Use a method called dimensional analysis here. It involves a chain of conversions, so we'll need some conversions to work with.

1nm = 1×10⁻⁹m
1mm = 1×10⁻³m
345nm; which is given

If you knew the conversion from nanometers to millimeters then you could just do it in one step. But I don't, so I won't. Anyways, you put the conversions into fraction form like so:

1nm/1×10⁻⁹m
1mm/1×10⁻³m

And then orient them in a way where multiplying the two (or more in other instances) gives you the units you want. In this cas it's millimeters so you'll have:

(345nm)•(1×10⁻⁹m/1nm)•(1mm/1×10⁻³m)

Notice how all the units reduce except for mm. From here you just multiply across and should get 345×10⁻⁶mm which simplifies to 3.45×10⁻⁴mm.

3 0

3 years ago

Ayudaaa no se como resolverlo con procedimiento :(

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

This is not Spanish bro

6 0

3 years ago

Two wires carrying equal currents exert a force ???????? on each other. (a) The current in each wire is doubled, while the dista

sweet-ann [11.9K]

a) The magnetic field created by a current-carrying wire is proportional to the current:

B ∝ I, B = magnetic field strength, I = current

The magnetic force acting on a current-carrying wire immersed in a magnetic field is proportional to the current and the magnetic field strength:

F ∝ IB, F = magnetic force, I = current, B = magnetic field strength

Let's focus on wire 1.

Since wire 2's current is doubled, wire 2 produces a magnetic field twice as strong as before.

Wire 1's current is also doubled, therefore we now have a wire having <em>twice as strong a current</em> immersed in <em>twice as strong a magnetic field</em>. The magnetic force on wire 1 (and you can make a similar argument for wire 2) will be four times as strong as before.

b) The general formula for the magnetic force acting on a current-carrying wire immersed in a magnetic field is given by:

F = IL×B

F = magnetic force vector

I = current

L = vector having a magnitude equal to wire length and representing direction of current

B = magnetic field vector

Note we are taking a cross product of the IL and B vectors, not the product of two scalar quantities.

The very nature of the cross product means that if L and B are parallel to each other, F = 0N

7 0

3 years ago