Answer:
authoritarian
Explanation:
According to my research on different parenting styles , I can say that based on the information provided within the question it would be most accurate to characterize his teaching as authoritarian. This is a governing/parenting style that focuses on a way of governing/parenting that emphasized order and control over personal freedom and is usually all done by a single entity, individual or group.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The correct answer is GDP or Gross Domestic product. It is used to determine the economic performance of the country and also compare economies on the international level. We can also calculate GDP per capita and PPP which is the purchasing power.
In the given situation, Adam’s claim is not valid. The apartment complex is not violating his constitutional rights as constitutional protections do not extend to privately-owned apartment complexes.
The Federal Fair Housing Acts (42 U.S. Code § § 3601–3619) forbid discrimination on the basis of race or color, faith, ethnic origin, sex, familial situation (having children and pregnancy), mental and physical disability.
Most of the states in the US don’t have any legal provisions, which protect people from discrimination on the basis of their marital status. So, in current situation, the landlord may legally ask questions about his relationship and may refuse to rent him the apartment.
<span>The Partition of Africa began in earnest with the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885, and was the cause of most of Africa’s borders today. This conference was called by German Chancellor Bismarck to settle how European countries would claim colonial land in Africa and to avoid a war among European nations over African territory. All the major European States were invited to the conference. Germany, France, Great Britain, Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal, and Spain were all considered to have a future role in the imperial partition of Africa. The United States was invited because of its interest in Liberia but did not attend because it had no desire to build a colonial empire in Africa. Also invited were Austria-Hungary, Sweden-Norway, Denmark, Italy, Turkey, and Russia who all were considered minor players in the quest for colonizing Africa, though Italy would claim some colonial possessions in Northeast Africa. Most notably there were no Africans present at this conference, nor were any Europeans present to ensure that native Africans had any say in the proceedings. - See more at: http://www.blackpast.org/gah/partition-africa#sthash.6d55XOtL.dpuf</span>
